Prove Irrationality of \log_{10}(2)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jgens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the irrationality of \log_{10}(2), a topic within number theory and properties of logarithms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts a proof by assuming \log_{10}(2) is rational and deriving a contradiction based on prime factorization. Some participants validate this approach, while others question the completeness of the argument by noting a specific case that could satisfy the equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes affirmations of the original proof's validity, alongside critical reflections on potential oversights in reasoning. Participants are engaging with the proof's structure and exploring nuances without reaching a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering all cases in proofs of irrationality, highlighting the complexity of such arguments.

jgens
Gold Member
Messages
1,575
Reaction score
50

Homework Statement



Prove that \log_{10}(2) is irrational.

Homework Equations



N/A

The Attempt at a Solution



Suppose not, then \log_{10}(2) = p/q where p and q are integers. This implies that 2 = 10^{p/q} or similarly, 2^q = 10^p. However, this is a contradiction since each number's prime factorization is unique - 2^q contains only 2's as prime factors while 10^p contains both 2's and 5's. Therefore, our assumption that \log_{10}(2) was rational must have been incorrect. This completes the proof.

I'm really bad at these irrationality proofs so I was wondering if someone could comment on the validity of my method. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks like a perfectly valid proof to me!
 
Swell! Thank you very much!
 
this is really clever!
i would have had no idea what to have done.
 
This comment is probably somewhat pedantic, but I think it's worth saying anyways.

2^q = 10^p is not quite a contradiction -- it can be satisfied when p=q=0. Of course, it's easy to derive a contradiction from that possibility.
 
Perhaps it's a bit pedantic but I definitely should have considered that case. Thanks for your input Hurkyl!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K