MHB Prove One-to-One Correspondence Conjugate Subgroups & Cosets N

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kiwi1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjugate
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving a one-to-one correspondence between the set of conjugates of a subgroup H and the set of cosets of a normal subgroup N. The user presents a solution defining a function f that maps conjugates to cosets, demonstrating that f is both well-defined and bijective by leveraging a previous result (Q7). The solution confirms that if two conjugates are equal, their corresponding cosets are also equal, establishing injectivity and surjectivity. A participant affirms the correctness of the solution and suggests that knowledge of group actions could provide a more concise proof. The discussion concludes with an endorsement of the user's approach to the problem.
Kiwi1
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Q. Prove there is a one-to-one correspondence between the set of conjugates of H and the set of cosets of N.

I have a solution to this below but am not sure if it is correct. In particular I am not sure if my definition 'f' is satisfactory. This is self study and not any kind of homework.

I have:
aHa^{-1}=\{axa^{-1}:x\epsilon H\}
N=\{a \epsilon G: axa^{-1} \epsilon H for every x \epsilon H \}

I have proven as part of the previous question:
Q7. For any a,b \epsilon G, aHa^{-1}= bHb^{-1} iff b^{-1}a \epsilon N iff aN=bN

SOLUTION
define the set of conjugates: X=\{aHa^{-1}:a \epsilon G \}
define the set of cosets of N: Y=\{aN:a \epsilon G \}

define f:X \rightarrow Y by f(aHa^{-1})=aN

f is well defined because if aHa^{-1}=bHb^{-1} then aN = bN by Q7.

Surjectivity:
for any aN \epsilon Y
f(aHa^{-1})=aN
where aHa^{-1} \epsilon X
therefore f is surjective

Injectivity:
suppose aN = bN
\therefore f(aHa^{-1})=f(bHb^{-1})
where aHa^{-1}=bHb^{-1} by Q7.
therefore f is injective

There is a bijection f from X to Y so there is a 1:1 correspondence between the members of X and Y.

Is this solution reasonably rigorous?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kiwi said:
Q. Prove there is a one-to-one correspondence between the set of conjugates of H and the set of cosets of N.

I have a solution to this below but am not sure if it is correct. In particular I am not sure if my definition 'f' is satisfactory. This is self study and not any kind of homework.

I have:
aHa^{-1}=\{axa^{-1}:x\epsilon H\}
N=\{a \epsilon G: axa^{-1} \epsilon H for every x \epsilon H \}

I have proven as part of the previous question:
Q7. For any a,b \epsilon G, aHa^{-1}= bHb^{-1} iff b^{-1}a \epsilon N iff aN=bN

SOLUTION
define the set of conjugates: X=\{aHa^{-1}:a \epsilon G \}
define the set of cosets of N: Y=\{aN:a \epsilon G \}

define f:X \rightarrow Y by f(aHa^{-1})=aN

f is well defined because if aHa^{-1}=bHb^{-1} then aN = bN by Q7.

Surjectivity:
for any aN \epsilon Y
f(aHa^{-1})=aN
where aHa^{-1} \epsilon X
therefore f is surjective

Injectivity:
suppose aN = bN
\therefore f(aHa^{-1})=f(bHb^{-1})
where aHa^{-1}=bHb^{-1} by Q7.
therefore f is injective

There is a bijection f from X to Y so there is a 1:1 correspondence between the members of X and Y.

Is this solution reasonably rigorous?
Your solution is fine. If you know group actions, then I can tell you a shorter solution.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
814
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
800
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
839
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K