MHB Prove One-to-One Correspondence Conjugate Subgroups & Cosets N

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kiwi1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjugate
Kiwi1
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Q. Prove there is a one-to-one correspondence between the set of conjugates of H and the set of cosets of N.

I have a solution to this below but am not sure if it is correct. In particular I am not sure if my definition 'f' is satisfactory. This is self study and not any kind of homework.

I have:
aHa^{-1}=\{axa^{-1}:x\epsilon H\}
N=\{a \epsilon G: axa^{-1} \epsilon H for every x \epsilon H \}

I have proven as part of the previous question:
Q7. For any a,b \epsilon G, aHa^{-1}= bHb^{-1} iff b^{-1}a \epsilon N iff aN=bN

SOLUTION
define the set of conjugates: X=\{aHa^{-1}:a \epsilon G \}
define the set of cosets of N: Y=\{aN:a \epsilon G \}

define f:X \rightarrow Y by f(aHa^{-1})=aN

f is well defined because if aHa^{-1}=bHb^{-1} then aN = bN by Q7.

Surjectivity:
for any aN \epsilon Y
f(aHa^{-1})=aN
where aHa^{-1} \epsilon X
therefore f is surjective

Injectivity:
suppose aN = bN
\therefore f(aHa^{-1})=f(bHb^{-1})
where aHa^{-1}=bHb^{-1} by Q7.
therefore f is injective

There is a bijection f from X to Y so there is a 1:1 correspondence between the members of X and Y.

Is this solution reasonably rigorous?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kiwi said:
Q. Prove there is a one-to-one correspondence between the set of conjugates of H and the set of cosets of N.

I have a solution to this below but am not sure if it is correct. In particular I am not sure if my definition 'f' is satisfactory. This is self study and not any kind of homework.

I have:
aHa^{-1}=\{axa^{-1}:x\epsilon H\}
N=\{a \epsilon G: axa^{-1} \epsilon H for every x \epsilon H \}

I have proven as part of the previous question:
Q7. For any a,b \epsilon G, aHa^{-1}= bHb^{-1} iff b^{-1}a \epsilon N iff aN=bN

SOLUTION
define the set of conjugates: X=\{aHa^{-1}:a \epsilon G \}
define the set of cosets of N: Y=\{aN:a \epsilon G \}

define f:X \rightarrow Y by f(aHa^{-1})=aN

f is well defined because if aHa^{-1}=bHb^{-1} then aN = bN by Q7.

Surjectivity:
for any aN \epsilon Y
f(aHa^{-1})=aN
where aHa^{-1} \epsilon X
therefore f is surjective

Injectivity:
suppose aN = bN
\therefore f(aHa^{-1})=f(bHb^{-1})
where aHa^{-1}=bHb^{-1} by Q7.
therefore f is injective

There is a bijection f from X to Y so there is a 1:1 correspondence between the members of X and Y.

Is this solution reasonably rigorous?
Your solution is fine. If you know group actions, then I can tell you a shorter solution.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
957
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
687
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
695
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
737
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K