MHB Prove $R$ is a Field: Finitely Generated Modules are Free

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unit.

I want to show that if $R\neq 0$ such that each finitely generated $R$-module is free then $R$ is field. Could you give me some hints how we could show that? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose that if $I$ is an ideal of the commutative ring $R$ and it is a free $R$-module, then it has a basis, i.e., a generating set consisting of linearly independent elements.

Does a finitely generated $R$-module is free when the basis is finite? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unit.

I want to show that if $R\neq 0$ such that each finitely generated $R$-module is free then $R$ is field. Could you give me some hints how we could show that? (Wondering)

It suffices to show that $R$ is a simple $R$-module. Let $J$ be a proper ideal of $R$. Then $R/J$ is a finitely generated $R$-module, hence free by hypothesis. Free modules have trivial annihilators, so $\operatorname{Ann}_R(R/J) = 0$. On the other hand, $\operatorname{Ann}_R(R/J) = J$. Hence, $J = 0$.
mathmari said:
Suppose that if $I$ is an ideal of the commutative ring $R$ and it is a free $R$-module, then it has a basis, i.e., a generating set consisting of linearly independent elements.

Does a finitely generated $R$-module is free when the basis is finite? (Wondering)

That does not make sense. A finitely generated $R$-module need not have a basis, but the ones that do are free by definition.
 
Euge said:
It suffices to show that $R$ is a simple $R$-module.

Why does this suffice? (Wondering)
Euge said:
Let $J$ be a proper ideal of $R$. Then $R/J$ is a finitely generated $R$-module, hence free by hypothesis.

Why does it follow that $R/J$ is a finitely generated $R$-module? (Wondering)
 
It suffices to show that $R$ is simple, since then $aR = R$ for every nonzero $a\in R$, and consequently, all nonzero elements are invertible.

Since $R/J$ is a quotient of a finitely generated $R$-module (namely, $R$ itself), then $R/J$ is finitely generated as an $R$-module.
 
Hi mathmari,

I don't think this is debatable, but is $0$ considered not to be a finitely generated $R$-module in your class? If that's not the case, then there is an issue with the problem statement

mathmari said:
Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unit.

I want to show that if $R\neq 0$ such that each finitely generated $R$-module is free then $R$ is field.

If we say an $R$-module $M$ is finitely generated if there is a surjection $R^n \to M$ for some positive integer $n$, then $0$ is finitely generated. In the hypothesis of your problem, $0$ would also be a free $R$-module, which would imply $0 \cong R^n$ for some positive integer $n$; this forces $R = 0$, contrary to assumption. The statement would be correct if "each finitely generated $R$-module is free" is replaced with "each finitely generated nontrivial $R$-module is free".
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
749
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
839
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
778
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K