MHB Prove $R$ is a Field: Finitely Generated Modules are Free

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion establishes that if \( R \) is a commutative ring with unit and every finitely generated \( R \)-module is free, then \( R \) must be a field. The proof hinges on showing that \( R \) is a simple \( R \)-module, which leads to the conclusion that all nonzero elements of \( R \) are invertible. The participants clarify that the definition of finitely generated \( R \)-modules excludes the zero module, ensuring consistency with the hypothesis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of commutative rings and their properties
  • Knowledge of finitely generated modules and free modules
  • Familiarity with the concept of simple modules
  • Basic understanding of ideals and quotient structures in ring theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of simple modules in ring theory
  • Learn about the structure of finitely generated modules over commutative rings
  • Explore the implications of the Noetherian property on modules
  • Investigate the relationship between ideals and their quotients in commutative algebra
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying abstract algebra, particularly those focusing on module theory and ring theory.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unit.

I want to show that if $R\neq 0$ such that each finitely generated $R$-module is free then $R$ is field. Could you give me some hints how we could show that? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose that if $I$ is an ideal of the commutative ring $R$ and it is a free $R$-module, then it has a basis, i.e., a generating set consisting of linearly independent elements.

Does a finitely generated $R$-module is free when the basis is finite? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unit.

I want to show that if $R\neq 0$ such that each finitely generated $R$-module is free then $R$ is field. Could you give me some hints how we could show that? (Wondering)

It suffices to show that $R$ is a simple $R$-module. Let $J$ be a proper ideal of $R$. Then $R/J$ is a finitely generated $R$-module, hence free by hypothesis. Free modules have trivial annihilators, so $\operatorname{Ann}_R(R/J) = 0$. On the other hand, $\operatorname{Ann}_R(R/J) = J$. Hence, $J = 0$.
mathmari said:
Suppose that if $I$ is an ideal of the commutative ring $R$ and it is a free $R$-module, then it has a basis, i.e., a generating set consisting of linearly independent elements.

Does a finitely generated $R$-module is free when the basis is finite? (Wondering)

That does not make sense. A finitely generated $R$-module need not have a basis, but the ones that do are free by definition.
 
Euge said:
It suffices to show that $R$ is a simple $R$-module.

Why does this suffice? (Wondering)
Euge said:
Let $J$ be a proper ideal of $R$. Then $R/J$ is a finitely generated $R$-module, hence free by hypothesis.

Why does it follow that $R/J$ is a finitely generated $R$-module? (Wondering)
 
It suffices to show that $R$ is simple, since then $aR = R$ for every nonzero $a\in R$, and consequently, all nonzero elements are invertible.

Since $R/J$ is a quotient of a finitely generated $R$-module (namely, $R$ itself), then $R/J$ is finitely generated as an $R$-module.
 
Hi mathmari,

I don't think this is debatable, but is $0$ considered not to be a finitely generated $R$-module in your class? If that's not the case, then there is an issue with the problem statement

mathmari said:
Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unit.

I want to show that if $R\neq 0$ such that each finitely generated $R$-module is free then $R$ is field.

If we say an $R$-module $M$ is finitely generated if there is a surjection $R^n \to M$ for some positive integer $n$, then $0$ is finitely generated. In the hypothesis of your problem, $0$ would also be a free $R$-module, which would imply $0 \cong R^n$ for some positive integer $n$; this forces $R = 0$, contrary to assumption. The statement would be correct if "each finitely generated $R$-module is free" is replaced with "each finitely generated nontrivial $R$-module is free".
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
911
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
971
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
912
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K