Prove R is a Sub-ring of $\mathbb{Q}$ - Prime $p \in \mathbb{Z}$

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fabiancillo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the set \( R = \{m/n \in \mathbb{Q} : p \text{ does not divide } n\} \) is a sub-ring of the rational numbers \( \mathbb{Q} \), where \( p \) is a prime number. Key conditions for \( R \) to be a sub-ring include closure under multiplication and subtraction, as well as containing the multiplicative identity. The group of units \( R^{\times} \) consists of elements \( m/n \) where \( p \) does not divide either \( m \) or \( n \), forming a group under multiplication.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rational numbers \( \mathbb{Q} \)
  • Knowledge of prime numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with ring theory concepts, particularly sub-rings
  • Basic understanding of group theory, specifically groups of units
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of sub-rings in ring theory
  • Learn about the structure of groups of units in rings
  • Explore examples of other sub-rings of \( \mathbb{Q} \)
  • Investigate the implications of prime divisibility in algebraic structures
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of rings and fields, particularly in relation to rational numbers and prime numbers.

fabiancillo
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
Hello, I don't know to solve this exercise:

Let $p \in \mathbb{Z}$ be a prime number. Consider $R = \{m/n \in \mathbb{Q}: p$ does not divide $n \}$

How can I prove that $R $ is a sub-ring of $\mathbb{Q}$? (only the obvious parts) and find the group of units of $R, R^{\times}$I have no idea.How can I solve ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi cristianoceli,

One of the equivalent definitions for a subring is:
"A subset S of R is a subring if and only if it is closed under multiplication and subtraction, and contains the multiplicative identity of R."


How far can we get with those conditions?
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Hi cristianoceli,

One of the equivalent definitions for a subring is:
"A subset S of R is a subring if and only if it is closed under multiplication and subtraction, and contains the multiplicative identity of R."


How far can we get with those conditions?

Can you explain? Sorry

In the exercise I do not know if this happens

contains the multiplicative identity of R.
 
Suppose we have the elements $\frac{m_1}{n_1}$ and $\frac{m_2}{n_2}$. It means that $p$ does not divide $n_1$, and $p$ does not divide $n_2$ either.
Is $\frac{m_1}{n_1}\times\frac{m_2}{n_2}$ always an element of $R$?
If it is, then $R$ is closed under multiplication.
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Suppose we have the elements $\frac{m_1}{n_1}$ and $\frac{m_2}{n_2}$. It means that $p$ does not divide $n_1$, and $p$ does not divide $n_2$ either.
Is $\frac{m_1}{n_1}\times\frac{m_2}{n_2}$ always an element of $R$?
If it is, then $R$ is closed under multiplication.
I understand but .

What are the units of $R$?
 
cristianoceli said:
What are the units of $R$?
The units of a ring $R$ are the elements that are invertible with respect to multiplication.
Which elements are invertible?
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
The units of a ring $R$ are the elements that are invertible with respect to multiplication.
Which elements are invertible?
$1$ ,$-1$ and prime numbers $\neq p$?
 
Last edited:
cristianoceli said:
$1$ ,$-1$ and prime numbers $\neq p$?
Those are indeed units, but there are more.

The multiplicative inverse of $\frac{m}{n}$, if it exists in $R$, is $\frac{n}{m}$.
What do we need for $\frac{n}{m}$ to be an element of $R$?
 
$p$ does not divide $m$
 
  • #10
Klaas van Aarsen said:
Those are indeed units, but there are more.

The multiplicative inverse of $\frac{m}{n}$, if it exists in $R$, is $\frac{n}{m}$.
What do we need for $\frac{n}{m}$ to be an element of $R$?
$R^{\times} = m \in \mathbb{Q} $ such that $p$ does not divide $m$ ?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
cristianoceli said:
$R^{\times} = n \in \mathbb{Q} $ such that $p$ does not divide $m$ ?
That should be: the set of units of $R$ is $\{m/n\in\mathbb Q : p\text{ does not divide }m \land p\text{ does not divide }n\}$.

This set happens to be a group with respect to multiplication named $R^\times$.
 
  • #12
I understand.

Thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
946
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K