Prove: Square Can Be Partitioned into n Smaller Squares for n > 14

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that a square can be partitioned into n smaller squares for integers n greater than 14. Participants explore the use of induction as a potential proof method, noting successful partitions for n = 15 and n = 17, while struggling with n = 16. The conversation highlights the importance of visual representation and clarifies the definition of "partition into smaller squares," questioning whether overlapping squares count towards the total. The need for a clear example, particularly for n = 15, is emphasized to aid understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with geometric partitioning concepts
  • Basic knowledge of square properties and grid formations
  • Ability to visualize mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research mathematical induction proofs in geometry
  • Explore examples of square partitioning for n = 15 and n = 16
  • Study the implications of modulo operations in geometric proofs
  • Investigate visual proof techniques for geometric partitioning problems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and enthusiasts interested in geometric proofs and partitioning theories, particularly those tackling advanced topics in mathematical induction.

CoachZ
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For n>14 such that n is an integer, prove that a square can be partitioned into n smaller squares...

Homework Equations



None...

The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking this would be somewhat of an induction proof because we are working our way up to n. So far, I've found when n = 15, n = 17, but somehow n = 16 is eluding me at the moment. I'm just trying to see what it would look like if I were to do this visually, however my assumption is that this has to deal with modulo 3 in some form or another. How this works into a proof is also something that is eluding me. Any suggestions would be warmly welcomed!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry I can't be of much help, but at first sight a proof by induction seems impossible. Because suppose you have shown that if it is possible for n, then it can also be done for n + 1.
Clearly, for n = 4 the statement is true (or even for n = 1, if you want). Also, what do you mean by "partition into smaller squares"? Does that count all squares? For example, when you draw a 3x3 grid in the square, does that give 9 squares? Or does that give 9 (1x1) squares + 4 (2x2) squares = 13 in total?
Also, can you post an image for n = 15, just to get the problem clear?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K