MHB Prove that the quotient space R^n / U is isomorphic to the subspace W

toni07
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Let A be an m x n matrix with entries in R. Let T_A : R^n -> R^m be the linear map T_A(X) = A_X. Let U be the solution set of the homogeneous linear system A_X = O. Let W be the set of all vectors Y such that Y = A_X for some X in R^n. I don't really know what I'm supposed to do here, any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
crypt50 said:
Let A be an m x n matrix with entries in R. Let T_A : R^n -> R^m be the linear map T_A(X) = A_X. Let U be the solution set of the homogeneous linear system A_X = O. Let W be the set of all vectors Y such that Y = A_X for some X in R^n. I don't really know what I'm supposed to do here, any help would be greatly appreciated.

Hi crypt50! :)

Let's get our definitions straight:
\begin{aligned}
U &= \text{Ker } A \\
W &= \text{Im } A
\end{aligned}

According to the isomorphism theorem (see e.g. wiki), $\text{Im }A$ is isomorphic with the quotient space $\mathbb R^n / \text{Ker }A$.$\qquad \blacksquare$
 
Thread 'How to define vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
727
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
789
Replies
5
Views
932
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K