Prove Weakly Stationary Process w/$E(X^2_t ) < ∞$

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A strictly stationary process with finite second moment, denoted as $E(X^2_t) < ∞$, is indeed weakly stationary. This conclusion is based on two key properties: the mean value function $u_t$ is time-independent, and the autocovariance function $\gamma_x(t+h,t)$ does not depend on time $t$. The proof establishes that since the distribution of ${X_t}$ is independent of time, the first condition is satisfied. Furthermore, the joint distribution of $X_t$ and $X_{t+h}$ being independent of $t$ confirms the weak stationarity of the process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of strictly stationary processes
  • Knowledge of weak stationarity and its definitions
  • Familiarity with mean value functions and autocovariance functions
  • Concept of second moments in probability theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of strictly stationary processes
  • Explore the implications of weak stationarity in time series analysis
  • Learn about the relationship between moments and distribution independence
  • Investigate examples of weakly stationary processes in statistical applications
USEFUL FOR

Statisticians, data scientists, and researchers in time series analysis who need to understand the relationship between strict and weak stationarity in stochastic processes.

nacho-man
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Not 100% sure if this is the right board.

My question is to
Show that a strictly stationary process with $E(X^2_t ) < ∞$ is weakly stationary.

So weakly stationary implies two things:

- the mean value function $u_t$ does not depend on time $t$
and
- the autocovariance $\gamma_x(t+h,t)$ is independent of $t$ for each $h$

The first point is fairly intuitive, but just to clarify, the second point is saying that the ACF does not depend on the time $t$ at any point when finding the autocovariance between two different points in time for any given $h$ ?Anyway, continuing on to the question,

the solutions say:

$E[X_t]$ is independent of $t$ since the distribution of ${X_t}$ is independent of $t$ and $E[X_t]$ exists.
So that proves the first point, but isn't this just an obvious re-iteration of the first definition of a weakly stationary set?
How does the 2nd moment being finite allow us to conclude that the distribution of ${X_t}$ is independent of $t$?

The 2nd point of the solution says: the joint distribution of $X_t , X_{t+h}$ is independent of t, hence ${X_t}$ is weakly stationary.

Are these both valid solutions? It seems as if just the definition of a weakly stationary set has been provided. I feel a little confused as to why these conclusions cannot be made if $E^2[X] \nless \infty$

Any help with understanding this is very appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

The assumption of finiteness of $\mathbb E(X_t^2)$ is done because otherwise the quantities $\mathbb E(X_tX_{t+h})$ involved in the definition of weak stationarity do not necessarily make sense.

The solution is valid.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
976
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K