Prove whether Cross-Product is associative

[Saladsamurai]

Homework Statement

Using the definition \bold{A}\times \bold{B}=AB\sin\theta show whether or not (\bold<br /> A\times\bold B)\times\bold C=\bold A\times(\bold B\times\bold C)



I know this is probably easy, but I am missing the obvious here. So I started like this:

Assuming \theta lies between A and B and \phi lies between \bold{A}\times \bold{B} and C then (\bold<br /> A\times\bold B)\times\bold C=(AB\sin\theta)C\sin\phi ... wait is that it?

Since that mess is associative then so is the cross-product?

Granted, I should probably include an angle between B and C to be thorough...

 

[rock.freak667]

yes you should include an angle between B and C, put it as \alpha and the angle between A and (B x C) as \beta. You'd get:

|\bold A\times(\bold B\times\bold C)|= Asin\beta(BCsin\alpha)

Now in only a certain case would this be true,right?

 

[NoMoreExams]

Isn't it just enough to come up with a counterexample to show that it's not true or were you specifically told to use the definition?

 

[Saladsamurai]

yes you should include an angle between B and C, put it as \alpha and the angle between A and (B x C) as \beta. You'd get:

|\bold A\times(\bold B\times\bold C)|= Asin\beta(BCsin\alpha)

Now in only a certain case would this be true,right?

When alpha=beta ?

 

[HallsofIvy]

Homework Statement

Using the definition \bold{A}\times \bold{B}=AB\sin\theta show whether or not (\bold<br /> A\times\bold B)\times\bold C=\bold A\times(\bold B\times\bold C)




I know this is probably easy, but I am missing the obvious here. So I started like this:

Assuming \theta lies between A and B and \phi lies between \bold{A}\times \bold{B} and C then (\bold<br /> A\times\bold B)\times\bold C=(AB\sin\theta)C\sin\phi ... wait is that it?

Since that mess is associative then so is the cross-product?

Granted, I should probably include an angle between B and C to be thorough...

No, that's not a complete proof. You are correct that the length of (AxB)xC is |A||B||C| sin(\theta)sin(\phi) where \theta is the angle between A and B and \phi is the angle between (AxB) and C. But you haven't even looked at Ax(BxC). That would have length |A||B||C|sin(\alpha)sin(\beta) where \alpha is the angle between B and C and \beta is the angle between A and BxC. Is see no reason to assume those angles are the same as \theta and \phi and no reason to assume those lengths are the same. In fact, even if you could prove those lengths are the same, that would not prove the vectors are the same.


That is so complicated I might tend to assume it is false and look for a counter example, as NoMoreExams said. If fact, it might be something as simple as ((i + j)xk) x k and (i+ j) x (k x k). What are those?

 

[Saladsamurai]

Hmm. Well I think the latter is 0 since k x k=0. I know that that the angle between (i+j) and k is non-zero since the angles between i and k and j and k are non-zero, hence the angle between (i+j) x k and k is non-zero, hence the cross product is non-zero.

Is that what you are thinking Halls?