MHB Prove x ≥ a: Let Real Numbers $x, y, z, a, b, c$

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $x, y, z, a, b, c$ be positive real numbers for which $z \ge y \ge x$ and $c \ge b \ge a$, $x+y+z=a+b+c$, $xyz=abc$ and $z \ge c$. Prove that $x \ge a$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Let $x, y, z, a, b, c$ be positive real numbers for which $z \ge y \ge x$ and $c \ge b \ge a$, $x+y+z=a+b+c$, $xyz=abc$ and $z \ge c$. Prove that $x \ge a$.

My solution:

If we let

$f(t)=(t-a)(t-b)(t-c)=t^3-(a+b+c)t^2+(ab+bc+ca)t-abc$ and

$g(t)=(t-x)(t-y)(t-z)=t^3-(x+y+z)t^2+(xy+yz+zx)t-xyz$

Then we see that:

$f(t)-g(t)=(ab+bc+ca-xy-yz-zx)t$ is a straight line.

At $t=z$, $f(t)-g(t)=f(z)-g(z)=f(z)<0$

Also, when $t=0$, we have

$\begin{align*}f(t)-g(t)&=f(0)-g(0)\\&=-abc-(-xyz)\\&=-abc+xyz\\&=0 \end{align*}$

Hence we can draw conclusion that the straight line $f(t)-g(t)=(ab+bc+ca-xy-yz-zx)t$ is always negative for $t>0$.

That is, $f(t)-g(t)<0$ or $f(t)<g(t)$ for $0<t<a$. This holds only when $x \ge a$.

Hence we're done.
 
Hi MHB,

I realized only by now that I've posted the terribly wrong answer to this particular challenge problem of mine and I am extremely sorry about that.

I will now post another suggested solution by other and please discard my previous solution post, thanks.

If we let

$f(t)=(t-a)(t-b)(t-c)=t^3-(a+b+c)t^2+(ab+bc+ca)t-abc$ and

$g(t)=(t-x)(t-y)(t-z)=t^3-(x+y+z)t^2+(xy+yz+zx)t-xyz$

Then we see that:

$f(t)-g(t)=(ab+bc+ca-xy-yz-zx)t$ never changes sign for positive values of $t$.

Since $f(t)>0$ for $t>c$, we have that $f(z)-g(z)=f(z) \ge 0$, so that $f(t) \ge g(t)$ for all $t>0$.

Hence, for $0<t<a$, $g(t) \le f(t) <0$, from which it follows that $g(t)$ has no root less than $a$. Hence $x \ge a$ as desired.
 
anemone said:
Let $x, y, z, a, b, c$ be positive real numbers for which $z \ge y \ge x$ and $c \ge b \ge a$, $x+y+z=a+b+c$, $xyz=abc$ and $z \ge c$. Prove that $x \ge a$.
View attachment 1856
can you find another sets of values ?
(a<b<c , x<y<z and c<z )
(a+b+c=x+y+z)
(abc=xyz)
with a,b,c,x,y,z>0
 

Attachments

  • x is greater than a.JPG
    x is greater than a.JPG
    45.8 KB · Views: 92
Albert said:
can you find another sets of values ?
(a<b<c , x<y<z and c<z )
(a+b+c=x+y+z)
(abc=xyz)
with a,b,c,x,y,z>0

Hi Albert,

Here is another set of the values which is not very hard to find::o

$(x,\,y,\,z)=(5,\,5.2,\,8.1)$

$(a,\,b,\,c)=(4.5,\,6,\,7.8)$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top