MHB Prove y is not a perfect square

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Square
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
$x\in N$
$y=x^4+2x^3+2x^2+2x+1$
prove:$y$ is not a perfect square
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For all $x > 0$, $$(x^2 + x)^2 = x^4 + 2x^3 + x^2 < x^4 + 2x^3 + 2x^2 + 2x + 1 < x^4 + 2x^3 + 3x^2 + 2x + 1 = (x^2 + x + 1)^2$$ As $y$ is sitting in between two consecutive perfect squares for $x \in \Bbb N \setminus \{0\}$, $y$ cannot itself be a perfect square.
 
$y=x^4+2x^3+2x^2+2x+1$
=$x^4+2x^2+1+2x^3+2x$
=$(x^2+1)^2+2x(x^2+1)$
= $(x^2+1)(x^2+2x+1)$
= $(x^2+1)(x+1)^2$
as $x^2+1$ is between $x^2$ and $(x+1)^2$ and not a perfect square and $(x+1)^2$ is so the product is not a perfect square
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top