Providing a proof or counter example.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the inequality \(x^2 + 1 < (x + 1)^2 \leq 2(x^2 + 1)\) for all \(x > 0\). The user initially attempted a graphical approach but shifted to a direct proof using algebraic manipulation. They successfully demonstrated the inequalities by rearranging terms and applying the transitive property, ultimately confirming that the inequalities hold true for \(x > 0\). The proof methods discussed include Direct Proof, Counterexample, and Contradiction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic manipulation and inequalities
  • Familiarity with proof techniques such as Direct Proof and Contradiction
  • Basic knowledge of functions and their properties
  • Graphing functions to visualize inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inequalities in algebra
  • Learn more about proof techniques, specifically Direct Proof and Contradiction
  • Explore the concept of limits and behavior of functions as \(x\) approaches 0
  • Investigate the use of graphical methods to support algebraic proofs
USEFUL FOR

Students studying mathematics, particularly those focusing on algebra and proof techniques, as well as educators looking for examples of inequality proofs.

Dougggggg
Messages
152
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove or give a counterexample: for all x > 0 we have x2+1< (x+1)2\leq 2(x2+1)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I used my calculator to do the graph of all 3 functions and saw that the statement was always true (at least for x>0). So I couldn't see another proof method that would work so I just went ahead with the direct proof.

Kept rewriting the functions and narrowing down until I got to this below.

-(1/x) < 2 - (1/x) \leq x

My intuition says that if x>0 that when x gets smaller and smaller, the first two terms get more and more negative. As x gets bigger and bigger, the term on the right becomes larger while the other only get slightly larger. However, I didn't see that as a proper "proof."

If it is any help, my class has learned these proof methods so far: Direct Proof, Counterexample, Contrapositive, Contradiction, and proof by cases.

Edit: Found something, I managed to do some algebra and rearranged it to the form of -2x<0<(x-1)(x-1) and pretend that second inequality includes "or equal to." There is a square on the right which will always be positive or 0 and in the problem it says x>0 so that first term will always be less than 0. Sweet.

If something is wrong in my logic please tell me.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For what values of x are any pair of the functions equal?
 
SammyS said:
For what values of x are any pair of the functions equal?

Try x=1
 
Did you do your algebra wrong?
First one is: x^2+1
Second one is: x^2 + 2x + 1
Third term is: 2x^2 + 2

Subtract x^2 from every one you get:

1 less than 2x+1 less than or equal to x^2+2

Subtract 1 from every one you get:

0 less than 2x less than or equal to x^2 + 1

Now I would prove all of them separately:
0 less than 2x
then
0 less than x^2 + 1
then
2x less than or equal to x^2 + 1

OR

0 < 2x
2x less than or equal to x^2+1

finally use transitive property to show 0
 
From where you are, minus 2x. You have (-2x), then 0, then x^2 -2x + 1. Which factors into (x-1)(x-1) or (x-1)^2
 
Dougggggg said:
From where you are, minus 2x. You have (-2x), then 0, then x^2 -2x + 1. Which factors into (x-1)(x-1) or (x-1)^2

I like that. It makes it even easier because any number squared is greater than or equal to zero. And -2x is always less than zero for x > 0. Both should be pretty easy to prove.
 
Yea, that is what I ended up doing, it was turned in yesterday at like 9 am.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K