Proving A ⊆ B using Set Theory

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
13 replies · 2K views
glebovg
Messages
156
Reaction score
0
How would I prove [itex]A \subseteq B \Leftrightarrow A \cap B^{c} = \emptyset[/itex] ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is what I have so far:

Suppose [itex]A \cap B^{c} = \emptyset[/itex]. Let [itex]x \in A[/itex]. We want to show [itex]x \in B[/itex]. Since [itex]A \cap B^{c} = \emptyset[/itex] and [itex]x \in A[/itex] then [itex]x \notin B^{c}[/itex]. Hence [itex]x \in B[/itex].
 
It is supposed to be [itex]A \subseteq B \Leftrightarrow A \cap B^{c} = \emptyset[/itex].
 
So ([itex]\Rightarrow[/itex]) is correct? First, I suppose [itex]A \subseteq B[/itex]. Then I let [itex]x \in A[/itex] and therefore [itex]x \in B[/itex] by supposition, but then it does not lead me anywhere.
 
[itex]\emptyset[/itex] ?
 
Also, we know [itex]\emptyset \subseteq A \cap B^{c}[/itex] and we want to show [itex]A \cap B^{c} \subseteq \emptyset[/itex], but I do not know how to do it.
 
No, that would be a contradiction.
 
Is this correct?

Suppose [itex]A \subseteq B[/itex]. Let [itex]x \in A[/itex]. Then [itex]x \in B \because A \subseteq B[/itex]. [itex]A \cap B^{c} \Rightarrow x \in A[/itex] and [itex]x \in B^{c}[/itex] by definition of intersection. Since [itex]x \in B[/itex], [itex]A \cap B^{c} = \emptyset[/itex].