Proving Algebraic Nature of Root 3 + Root 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter lokisapocalypse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root
Click For Summary
To prove that root 3 + root 2 is an algebraic number, it must be expressed as a polynomial with rational coefficients. By simplifying root 3 + root 2, it can be shown to equal root 6. This simplification allows root 6 to be represented as a polynomial: 0 * x^3 + 0 * x^2 + 0 * x + 1 * x^0. Consequently, since root 6 is an algebraic number, root 3 + root 2 is also confirmed to be algebraic. The discussion effectively demonstrates the algebraic nature of root 3 + root 2 through polynomial representation.
lokisapocalypse
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I need to show that this is an algebraic number.

In other words,

I need to show: an*x^n + an1*x^(n-1) + ... + a1 * x^1 + a0 * x^0 =
where the a terms are not ALL 0 but some of them can be.

Like for root 2 by itself,

I have 1 * (root 2) ^ 2 + 0 * (root 2)^1 + -2 * (root 2) ^ 0
lokisapocalypse is online now Edit/Delete Message
 
Physics news on Phys.org


To prove the algebraic nature of root 3 + root 2, we need to show that it can be expressed as a polynomial with rational coefficients.

First, let's simplify root 3 + root 2 by using the distributive property:

root 3 + root 2 = (1 * root 3) + (1 * root 2)

Next, we can use the property of radicals that states the product of two radicals is equal to the radical of the product of the two numbers inside the radicals.

So, (1 * root 3) + (1 * root 2) = root (3 * 2)

Simplifying further, we get root 6.

Now, we can express root 6 as a polynomial with rational coefficients:

root 6 = 0 * x^3 + 0 * x^2 + 0 * x + 1 * x^0

This shows that root 6 is an algebraic number, and since root 3 + root 2 can be simplified to root 6, it is also an algebraic number.

Therefore, we have proven that root 3 + root 2 is an algebraic number, as it can be expressed as a polynomial with rational coefficients.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
884
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
833
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K