Proving the Algebraic Nature of Root 3 + Root 2 Using Polynomial Expressions"

  • Thread starter Thread starter lokisapocalypse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the expression \(\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2}\) is an algebraic number using polynomial expressions. Participants explore various methods to establish this property within the context of algebra and polynomial theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest different polynomial forms and methods to demonstrate that \(\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2}\) is algebraic, including finding conjugates and using properties of surds. Some question the accuracy of computational tools like Maple in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes multiple approaches to derive a polynomial with integral coefficients that has \(\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2}\) as a root. Participants are actively engaging with each other's suggestions, and some express uncertainty about specific steps or results.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential errors in calculations and the challenges of symbolic arithmetic versus numerical approximation. The discussion also touches on the relevance of the topic to modern algebra courses.

lokisapocalypse
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I need to show that this is an algebraic number.

In other words,

I need to show: an*x^n + an1*x^(n-1) + ... + a1 * x^1 + a0 * x^0 =
where the a terms are not ALL 0 but some of them can be.

Like for root 2 by itself,

I have 1 * (root 2) ^ 2 + 0 * (root 2)^1 + -2 * (root 2) ^ 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about a5=1, a3=-10, a1=1, all others zero?
 
According to Maple, that gives -.30e-7.
 
let [tex]x = \sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2}[/tex]

then [tex](x - \sqrt{3})^2 = x^2 - 2\sqrt{3}x + 3 = 2[/tex]

... something like that. put one square root one one side & the rest on the other, square both sides, etc etc then you'll get a 4th-degree polynomial that has [tex]\sqrt{3} + \sqrt{2}[/tex] as a root. end of proof
 
lokisapocalypse said:
According to Maple, that gives -.30e-7.

Rounding error.

--J
 
The easiest way is just to find an equation with integral coefficients that has the number as a root.

What is the square of [tex]\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3}[/tex] ? Express that in the form : integer plus a square root. Let's call this [tex]n_1 = a + \sqrt{b}[/tex]

Next, find the conjugate of the number. [tex]n_2 = a - \sqrt{b}[/tex]

Set up the equation [tex](y - n_1)(y - n_2) = 0[/tex] and expand it out. You know for certain that this equation is going to have integral coefficients because that's a property of conjugate surds.

Once you have that equation in y, just put [tex]x^2 = y[/tex] and get a quartic in x. That equation will have [tex]\sqrt{2} + \sqrt{3}[/tex] as one of the roots, and you're done.
 
Last edited:
You can look at this from the standpoint of Galois theory. Along with one surd we are going to get the conjugate of: [tex]\pm\sqrt2[/tex]. So putting both roots in a quadratic makes the coefficients rational. [tex]x^2-2=0[/tex].

The same idea can be applied to this expression: [tex]\pm\sqrt{2}[/tex][tex]\pm\sqrt{3}[/tex]. We don't want the surds to appear in the coefficients.

Maybe not as efficient as described in previous postings, but does offer some insight.
 
Last edited:
According to Maple, that gives -.30e-7.

It shouldn't; Maple is capable of doing symbolic arithmetic. Don't ask it to approximate. :-p

By the way, please don't multiple post. :mad:
 
Last edited:
Standard method: Use the fact that (a+ b)(a- b)= a2- b2 to get rid of the square roots.
[tex](x- \sqrt{3}-\sqrt{2})(x-\sqrt{3}+ \sqrt{2})= (x- \sqrt{3})^2- 2= x^2- 2\sqrt{3}x+1[/tex]

[tex](x^2+1-2\sqrt{3}x)(x^2+1+2\sqrt{3}x)= (x^2+1)^2- 12x^2= x^4+ 2x^2+ 1- 12x^2= x^4- 10x^2+ 1[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{3}+ \sqrt{2}[/tex]
is algebraic because it satisfies
[tex]x^4-10x^2+ 1[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
You made a typo in there somewhere.
 
  • #11
I apologize for the multiple post...I was in a panic. Won't happen again.
 
  • #12
Hurkyl said:
You made a typo in there somewhere.

Yep, I dropped an "x" early on. I've edited it. Thanks, Hurkyl.
 
  • #13
Wow, I hope I never have to do these kind of problems. What course is this for?
 
  • #14
adc85 said:
Wow, I hope I never have to do these kind of problems. What course is this for?

Modern Algebra course of some kind. I'm doing a similar one myself this semester. Actually, I solved that very exercise a couple of hours ago.

Very nice course, by the way. Don't hope without knowing. :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K