Proving an Inequality: Understanding α - 2β < 0 with β > α

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the inequality α - 2β < 0 under the condition that β > α, with both α and β being positive numbers. Participants explore the implications of the given conditions and seek to establish a mathematical justification for the inequality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants question the validity of concluding α - 2β < 0 based on the given conditions, while others attempt to rephrase the problem for clarity. There are discussions about specific numerical examples and the implications of the inequality.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering various lines of reasoning and attempting to clarify the mathematical relationships involved. Some have suggested potential proofs while others express uncertainty about the assumptions being made.

Contextual Notes

There is a note that the problem is not a formal homework assignment but rather a curiosity stemming from a broader mathematical exploration. Participants have indicated that they lack experience with proofs involving inequalities.

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5
Hello,

I am given that β > α, which can be written as β - α > 0. What justification would I have to use in order to conclude that α - 2β < 0, given that the preceding propositions are true? Could someone possibly help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bashyboy said:
Hello,

I am given that β > α, which can be written as β - α > 0. What justification would I have to use in order to conclude that α - 2β < 0, given that the preceding propositions are true? Could someone possibly help me?

This is not necessarily true: if α = -3 and β = -2 we have α < β but 2β < α.

Anyway, you are supposed to show your work.
 
This isn't actually a homework problem. It was something I came across and found curious, when I was drawing the slopes fields of a differential equation.

I also forgot to mention that alpha and beta are both positive.
 
Note: I can not provide my attempt at solving this problem, for I never did attempt at solving it; the reason being, that I do not know enough about inequalities to solve this problem. As I said, this is not a homework problem, it is a side-tracking.
 
So, to re-phrase the question. You have two positive numbers. You start with the smaller one and subtract twice the larger one and you want to prove that the answer is less than zero?
 
PeroK, if I read your sentences correctly, yes that is what I would like to prove, rather, I would like to know how to prove, as I have never done any proves involving inequalities.

α > 0 and β > 0, and β > α, and I would like to know if we can conclude that α - 2β < 0.
 
Bashyboy said:
PeroK, if I read your sentences correctly, yes that is what I would like to prove, rather, I would like to know how to prove, as I have never done any proves involving inequalities.

α > 0 and β > 0, and β > α, and I would like to know if we can conclude that α - 2β < 0.

Well, if you had $α in the bank. And you withdrew $β. Then you withdrew $β again. Do you think you might be overdrawn? If β > α.
 
I think there might be a misunderstanding. I understand that statement α - 2β < 0 is true; I am looking for a little more mathematically rigorous proof of the fact.
 
Bashyboy said:
I think there might be a misunderstanding. I understand that statement α - 2β < 0 is true; I am looking for a little more mathematically rigorous proof of the fact.

What about:

α - 2β = α - β - β < α - β (as β > 0) < 0 (as α < β)
 
  • #10
I think if you take a step back and examine PeroK's last post (edit: the one talking about bank accounts), you might find that it is VERY suggestive of a proof. Very suggestive.
 
  • #11
Actually, I like this proof better:

α < β => α < 2β => α - 2β < 0
 
  • #12
PeroK said:
Actually, I like this proof better:

α < β => α < 2β => α - 2β < 0

You have assumed what he is trying to prove: he want to show that for a,b >0, a < b => a < 2b.
 
  • #13
Ray Vickson said:
You have assumed what he is trying to prove: he want to show that for a,b >0, a < b => a < 2b.

What about:

α < β => α < β + β => α < 2β => α - 2β < 0

I guess it's not that obvious that 2β = β + β. Hopefully that repairs the proof.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
98
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K