Proving Area of n-sided Polygons Maximizes When they are Regular?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Cadaei
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Polygons Regular
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a regular polygon maximizes area for a given perimeter. Participants highlight the intuitive understanding of this concept but struggle to provide a rigorous proof. Key methods mentioned include calculus of variations and Steiner Symmetrization. The proof involves demonstrating that any irregular polygon can be transformed into a regular one, thereby maximizing the area.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of regular polygons (equilateral and equiangular)
  • Familiarity with calculus of variations
  • Knowledge of the isoperimetric problem
  • Basic principles of geometric proofs and area calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the isoperimetric theorem in detail
  • Learn about Steiner Symmetrization and its applications
  • Explore calculus of variations techniques for optimization problems
  • Investigate geometric proofs related to polygon area maximization
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics educators, students studying geometry, and anyone interested in geometric optimization and proofs related to polygons.

Cadaei
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I'm a math tutor at a community college, and one of the students recently asked me why it is always true that a *regular* polygon (regular meaning equiangular and equilateral) has maximum area for any given perimeter. It makes perfect intuitive sense, but neither I nor any of the other tutors could figure out a rigorous method to prove it (the key word here being "rigorous").

The textbook skirted around the issue, and Google is turning up fuzzy results at best. Wikipedia states that it is fact, but only cites a book from 1979 that would be difficult to find.

eCookies for the most elegant proof (::) (::) (::) :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I will have to think more to come up with a proof, but I will make mention of some things now. One difficulty in these problems is you have to know what "shapes" are allowed. If you are only looking at platonic polynomials, a simple proof should be had.

However, I think these types of proofs can be very difficult if you are looking for full generality. For example, the isoperimetric problem simply states, of all closed curves in ##\mathbb{R}^2## having some fixed length, which one maximizes area? Intuitively the answer is a circle, but its proof is rather difficult.

In your problem you seem to be only looking at polynomials with fixed perimeter and a fixed number of sides. If you are familiar with calculus of variations, you could exhaust all such polynomials and have a proof. Steiner Symmetrization is also another promising route. However, I think these are some very large guns to for this problem.
 
It's actually fairly straightforward to prove that, for all *regular* polygons, the area is always less than that of a circle whose radius equals the distance from the center to a vertex of the polygon. You just construct the figure from isosceles triangles, write the area of the triangle in terms of the height of the triangle, and it can be shown that as n-> infinity, the area of the figure -> pi*r^2. The student had no problem accepting this at all.

The problem is in proving that the regular polygon maximizes the area to begin with for any given perimeter, which seems to be required for the above to be true (in the sense that the circle is not only the maximum area of regular n-gons, but of all n-gons of fixed perimeter).
 
Last edited:
Why not perform induction on the number of triangles? All shapes can be broken up into them, as you have already used. Deform the area of anyone triangle in the shapes, calculate area, induct on numberof triangles.
 
Cadaei said:
why it is always true that a *regular* polygon (regular meaning equiangular and equilateral) has maximum area for any given perimeter. .

eCookies for the most elegant proof (::) (::) (::) :)
You'll also need to fix (or at least limit) the number of edges.

Not elegant, but here goes:
Suppose a polygon P has n edges, not all the same length. There must be two adjacent edges, AB, BC, of different length. Drop a perpendicular from B to AC and show that the total area of the two triangles would be increased by replacing B with B', where AB' = B'C = (AB+BC)/2 (easy with a little calculus, probably a non-calculus method too).
So that shows all the edges must be the same length, and that completes the proof for triangles.

Suppose all edges are the same but not all angles. There must be two adjacent angles that differ, ABC, BCD. Let AD = H, AB = BC = CD = L, area ABCD = F. Let angle U = (BAD+CDA)/2, V = (BAD-CDA)/2.
With a bit of working,
(1) (H2 - L2)/4 = L(H cos V - L cos U)(cos U)
(2) F = L(H cos V - L cos U)(sin U)
Thus 4F = (H2 - L2) tan U
Varying V, F is max when dF/dV = 0, so dU/dV = 0.
Squaring and adding (1) and (2), then differentiating wrt V:
(H cos V - L cos U)(-H sin(V) + L sin(U).dU/dV) = 0
If (H cos V - L cos U) = 0 then F would be 0, so we have sin(V) = 0.
Thus BAD = CDA, so ABC = BCD.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K