Proving ~Au~B= ~(AnB): A Comprehensive Explanation with Examples

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jlemus85
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the set theory identity ~A ∪ ~B = ~(A ∩ B) using De Morgan's Law. The proof begins by demonstrating that if an element x belongs to the complement of the union of sets A and B, it must not belong to either A or B, thereby belonging to the complement of their intersection. The critical step involves applying the contrapositive and logical inference to establish the relationship between the complements and the intersection. The discussion emphasizes the reversible nature of the steps involved in the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory concepts such as union, intersection, and complement.
  • Familiarity with De Morgan's Laws in both logical and set contexts.
  • Basic knowledge of logical inference and contrapositives.
  • Ability to visualize set operations using Venn diagrams.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study De Morgan's Laws in detail, focusing on their applications in set theory.
  • Explore advanced set theory concepts, including Cartesian products and power sets.
  • Learn about logical proofs and inference techniques in mathematical reasoning.
  • Practice visualizing set operations with Venn diagrams to enhance understanding of intersections and unions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of set theory and logical proofs.

jlemus85
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

Was hoping I could get some help with the following:

Note= ~ indicates the complement of
Prove that:

~Au~B= ~(AnB)
So far I have: Let x belong to ~Au~b then x belongs to ~A or x belongs to ~B.
If x belongs to ~A then x is not in A thus x is not in ~AnB so x belongs to ~(AnB).
If x belongs to ~B then x is not in B thus x is not in ~AnB so x belongs to ~(AnB)

I am having trouble going the other way because if x belongs to ~(AnB) then x is not in AnB, but does this mean it's not in AuB? When I picture AnB I see two circles that overlap each other (not completely), and that small part where they over lap, that is AnB. But if x is not in AnB, how can we say with certainty that it isn't in the Complement of AuB? Is it because the complement of AuB IS the intersection of A, B? Hope that makes sense!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All the steps are essentially reversible. The hard part is that you are effectively "lifting" De Morgan's Law from the logical domain to a set domain. The critical step, in effect, looks almost dubious because it's so obvious.

Let x be in ~(AnB). Thus, x is in not in AnB. (definition of complement)

If x is in A and x is in B, then x is in AnB. (definition of intersection)

If x is not in AnB, then it is not true that x is in A and x is in B. (contrapositive)

It is not true that x is in A and x is in B. (Inference)

Either x is not in A or x is not in B. (Logical de morgan's law, this is the critical step)

Either x is in ~A or x is in ~B. (Def. of complement).

x is in ~Au~B. (Def of union)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K