Spivak: Conic Sections appendix, problem 1

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a cylinder defined by the equation ##x^2+y^2=C^2## and its intersection with a plane. The original poster attempts to show that this intersection can be described by the equation ##(αx+β)^2+y^2=C^2##, while grappling with the implications of the coordinate transformations involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the nature of the intersection between the cylinder and the plane, questioning the assumptions about the plane's orientation and the implications of the transformation to the new coordinate system. Some express confusion over how the transition from 3D to 2D is handled in the problem.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the problem, with some participants questioning the validity of the problem statement and others defending it based on the author's previous explanations. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to clarify the reasoning behind the equations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for confusion due to the use of similar variable names in different contexts, which may lead to misunderstandings about the relationships between the coordinates in the equations. There is also mention of the need to eliminate the z-coordinate to focus on the intersection in a 2D context.

Adgorn
Messages
133
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement


"Consider a cylinder with a generator perpendicular to the horizontal plane; the only requirement for a point ##(x,y,z)## to lie on this cylinder is that ##(x,y## lies on a circle: ##x^2+y^2=C^2##.
Show that the intersection of a plane with this cylinder can be described by an equation of the form ##(αx+β)^2+y^2=C^2##"

Homework Equations


##x^2+y^2=C^2##.
##z=Mx+B##
##(αx+β)^2+y^2=C^2##

The Attempt at a Solution


If we assume the plane in question is perpendicular to the x,z plane (Which the book does seem to assume, going by the explanations preceding this question), it is of the form ##ax+bz=c##. Thus a point ##(x,y,z)## is on it iff ##z=Mx+B## for some ##M, B## (This is how Spivak described the plane so I'm going with this).

So a point ##(x,y,z)## belongs to the intersection iff
1) ##x^2+y^2=C^2##.
2) ##z=Mx+B##

Obviously right from the start I'm misunderstanding the question since all the equation ##(αx+β)^2+y^2=C^2## does is takes the original cylinder, squeezes (or stretches) it along the x-axis and transports it along the x axis. Besides, since we can insert any z coordinate we want into a point described by this equation, it can't describe a 2D intersection.

I'm guessing that this equation is for after we "eliminate" the z axis and describe the intersection using a 2d coordinate system (of the intersecting plane), but I don't really know how to do that. I know that the new coordinate system would be:
##x = αx'+β, y=y'##
By this, it looks like all we need to do is insert these new coordinates into the cylinder equation and call it a day, but like I said, something more is needed. What am I missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there is an error in the problem statement. If you compare ##(αx+β)^2+y^2=C^2## with ##x^2+y^2=C^2##, you can see that it implies ##αx+β = \pm x##, which can only be true for two values of ##x##. I think what Spivak meant to say was ##(αz+β)^2+y^2=C^2##.
 
tnich said:
I think there is an error in the problem statement. If you compare ##(αx+β)^2+y^2=C^2## with ##x^2+y^2=C^2##, you can see that it implies ##αx+β = \pm x##, which can only be true for two values of ##x##. I think what Spivak meant to say was ##(αz+β)^2+y^2=C^2##.

I know there isn't an error since in the answer book Spivak reaches the same result. This problem follows directly from a segment where he explains conic sections and does basically the same thing, so I can't really show what he means here without quoting those 3 pages. So I'll just add them to show what he means here (I think that's copyright infringement but that's about all I can do, I'll delete them when I figure this out...).

https://ibb.co/kAKyVU
https://ibb.co/jXVSPp
https://ibb.co/kwRdVU

The solution goes as follows:
"The point ##(x,y,z)## is in the cylinder if and only if
##x^2+y^2=C^2##.
Choosing the coordinates in the plane P as on page 81 ,we see that the points in the intersection of P and the cylinder are those satisfying
##(αx+β)^2+y^2=C^2##.
The possibilities are ∅, a straight line, 2 parallel straight lines or an ellipse (or circle)."
The problem starts following the pages linked, so I guess in order to find out what he wants here I need to figure out what he meant there...
 
Last edited:
Adgorn said:
I know there isn't an error since in the answer book Spivak reaches the same result. This problem follows directly from a segment where he explains conic sections and does basically the same thing, so I can't really show what he means here without quoting those 3 pages. So I'll just add them to show what he means here (I think that's copyright infringement but that's about all I can do, I'll delete them when I figure this out...).

https://ibb.co/kAKyVU
https://ibb.co/jXVSPp
https://ibb.co/kwRdVU

The solution goes as follows:
"The point ##(x,y,z)## is in the cylinder if and only if
##x^2+y^2=C^2##.
Choosing the coordinates in the plane P as on page 81 ,we see that the points in the intersection of P and the cylinder are those satisfying
##(αx+β)^2+y^2=C^2##.
The possibilities are ∅, a straight line, 2 parallel straight lines or an ellipse (or circle)."
The problem starts following the pages linked, so I guess in order to find out what he wants here I need to figure out what he meant there...
Look at how he defined ##\alpha x + \beta## on p. 81. The author is essentially saying that ##x = \alpha x + \beta##. In that context, his solution for the cylinder makes sense, although it is confusing and in my opinion rather sloppy to use the same label ##x## to represent two different variables in the same problem. The normal way of avoiding problems like this is to use different labels, ##x## and ##w##, or ##x## and ##x'## for example. This makes it possible to use the rules of algebra without generating spurious results.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Adgorn
I get that there is a new ##x## being measured from the new coordinate system (I'll just call it ##x'##), what I don't get is how the solution was received. At first we have the equation ##x^2+y^2=C^2##, which describes a cylinder. Then all we do is express this equation in terms of a new coordinate system ##(αx'+β)^2+y'^2=C^2## and suddenly it describes only the points on the cylinder which are also on the plain. It's as if he gets rid of the 3rd dimension without ever explaining why, he does it with the conic section too:

In the (*) equation (page 81) he claims "A point ##(x,y,z)## is in the intersection of the cone and the plane if and only if ##Mx+B=±C\sqrt{x^2+y^2}##." But one can find infinite points that follow this equation with some random z coordinate that are not in the intersection. All points in the intersection follow this equation but the opposite is not necessarily true. The proper equation to my understanding would be ##Mx+B=±C\sqrt{x^2+y^2}=z##

I feel like both the misunderstandings I have about the cylinder and the cone stem from the same thing, something about the transition to the new coordinate system that suddenly turns equations in the 3d space to equations in the 2d plane...
 
Adgorn said:
I get that there is a new ##x## being measured from the new coordinate system (I'll just call it ##x'##), what I don't get is how the solution was received. At first we have the equation ##x^2+y^2=C^2##, which describes a cylinder. Then all we do is express this equation in terms of a new coordinate system ##(αx'+β)^2+y'^2=C^2## and suddenly it describes only the points on the cylinder which are also on the plain. It's as if he gets rid of the 3rd dimension without ever explaining why, he does it with the conic section too:

In the (*) equation (page 81) he claims "A point ##(x,y,z)## is in the intersection of the cone and the plane if and only if ##Mx+B=±C\sqrt{x^2+y^2}##." But one can find infinite points that follow this equation with some random z coordinate that are not in the intersection. All points in the intersection follow this equation but the opposite is not necessarily true. The proper equation to my understanding would be ##Mx+B=±C\sqrt{x^2+y^2}=z##

I feel like both the misunderstandings I have about the cylinder and the cone stem from the same thing, something about the transition to the new coordinate system that suddenly turns equations in the 3d space to equations in the 2d plane...
That's exactly what he is trying to do, get the equation of the intersection of the cylinder and the plane. He is trying to express that equation in a coordinate system embedded in the plane. He already showed you how that worked for the plane and the cone, and you didn't seem to have trouble with that. The only difference here is that the variable ##z## does not show up in the equation of the cylinder, so there is not need to express ##z## in terms of ##x##, and no need to substitute ##\alpha x' + \beta## for ##x## in the expression for ##z## (because there is no expression for ##z##).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K