Proving Basic Exponent Properties for a Group

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving the exponent properties for groups, specifically that \(x^m x^n = x^{m+n}\) and \((x^m)^n = x^{mn}\) for all integers \(m\) and \(n\), including negative integers. The standard recursive definition of exponents and the definition \(x^{-n} = (x^{-1})^n\) are utilized in the proof. The method involves setting \(n = -\nu\) for \(\nu \in \mathbb{N}\) and applying induction to demonstrate the properties hold for negative integers as well.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory and its properties
  • Familiarity with the recursive definition of exponents
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction techniques
  • Basic comprehension of negative integers and their manipulation in algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of mathematical induction in group theory proofs
  • Explore the implications of negative exponents in various algebraic structures
  • Learn about the properties of groups and their operations
  • Investigate advanced topics in abstract algebra, such as homomorphisms and isomorphisms
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in understanding the foundational properties of groups and exponentiation within mathematical structures.

middleCmusic
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
When proving that x^m x^n = x^{m+n} and that (x^m)^n = x^{mn} for all elements x in a group, it's easy enough to show that they hold for all m \in \mathbb{Z} and for all n \in \mathbb{N} using induction on n. The case n = 0 is also very easy. But how does one prove this for n \in \mathbb{Z}^{-}?

I tried to do it by using the fact that n = - \nu for some \nu \in \mathbb{N}, but this didn't get me anywhere. Do you have to do induction on the negative integers separately? I'm sure there's a simple answer to this question that I'm just not seeing.

Note that I'm working with the standard recursive definition of exponents, and the definition x^{-n} = (x^{-1})^n.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Update: I think I figured it out. I'd still appreciate a simpler way, if anyone has one.

For a negative integer n, set n = - \nu as before.
Then
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> x^m x^n <br /> &amp;= x^m x^{- \nu} \\<br /> &amp;= x^m (x^{-1})^{\nu} \\<br /> &amp;= ((x^{-1})^{-1})^m (x^{-1})^{\nu} \tag*{since $x = (x^{-1})^{-1}$} \\<br /> &amp;= (x^{-1})^{-m} (x^{-1})^{\nu} \tag*{by the definition of negative exponents} \\<br /> &amp;= (x^{-1})^{-m+\nu} \tag*{by the rule for positive exponents}\\<br /> &amp;= (x^{-1})^{-(m+ (-\nu))}\\<br /> &amp;= (x^{-1})^{-(m+n)} \\<br /> &amp;= ((x^{-1})^{-1})^{m+n} \\<br /> &amp;= x^{m+n} \tag*{since $x = (x^{-1})^{-1}$}<br /> \end{align}<br />
 
Last edited:
If you liked induction for positive n you can do induction for negative n also. Show if it holds for n, then it holds for n-1 as well
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
892
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K