Proving Cauchy-Schartz inequality in Brak-ket notation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality using bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics. Participants are exploring the mathematical expressions and implications of the inequality.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the structure of the inequality and the implications of substituting specific values for λ. Questions arise regarding the derivation of certain expressions and their validity.

Discussion Status

Some participants are engaging with the mathematical details and attempting to clarify the steps involved in the proof. There is an indication of productive dialogue, with one participant expressing gratitude for the responses received.

Contextual Notes

One participant expresses uncertainty about their understanding, indicating a potential lack of confidence in their reasoning. The discussion also reflects a focus on the algebraic manipulation of the expressions involved in the proof.

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] Proving Cauchy-Schartz inequality in Brak-ket notation

[itex](\langle \alpha | + \lambda^\ast\langle \beta |)(|\alpha\rangle+ \lambda|\beta\rangle) = \langle \alpha |\alpha \rangle + |\lambda|^2\langle \beta | \beta \rangle + \lambda \langle \alpha | \beta \rangle + \lambda^\ast \langle \beta | \alpha \rangle \geq 0[/itex].

Put [itex]\lambda = - \langle \beta| \alpha\rangle/\langle \beta|\beta \rangle[/itex]. Then

[itex]\langle \alpha | \alpha \rangle \langle\beta|\beta\rangle + |\langle\beta|\alpha\rangle|^2 - 2\langle \alpha |\beta\rangle \langle \beta | \alpha \rangle\geq 0[/itex].

Not quite what I wanted.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jdstokes said:
[itex](\langle \alpha | + \lambda^\ast\langle \beta |)(|\alpha\rangle+ \lambda|\beta\rangle) = \langle \alpha |\alpha \rangle + |\lambda|^2\langle \beta | \beta \rangle + \lambda \langle \alpha | \beta \rangle + \lambda^\ast \langle \beta | \alpha \rangle \geq 0[/itex].

Put [itex]\lambda = - \langle \beta| \alpha\rangle/\langle \beta|\beta \rangle[/itex]. Then

[itex]\langle \alpha | \alpha \rangle \langle\beta|\beta\rangle + |\langle\beta|\alpha\rangle|^2 - 2\langle \alpha |\beta\rangle \langle \beta | \alpha \rangle\geq 0[/itex].
the last line implies

[itex]\langle \alpha | \alpha \rangle \langle\beta|\beta\rangle - \langle \alpha |\beta\rangle \langle \beta | \alpha \rangle\geq 0[/itex]
so
[itex]\langle \alpha | \alpha \rangle \langle\beta|\beta\rangle \geq \langle \alpha |\beta\rangle \langle \beta | \alpha \rangle[/itex]
Isn't this what you wanted to show?
 
Thanks for replying.

How do you get [itex]\langle \alpha | \alpha \rangle \langle\beta|\beta\rangle - \langle \alpha |\beta\rangle \langle \beta | \alpha \rangle\geq 0[/itex]?
 
OMG I'm so dumb. No need to answer that. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K