MHB Proving conditional expectation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that if E(U|X) = E(U) = 0 for random variables U and X, then it follows that E(U^2|X) = E(U^2). A participant challenges this assumption by providing a counterexample where U conditioned on X has a non-zero variance. The conversation then shifts to the context of homoskedasticity in simple linear regression, questioning how the conclusion σ² = E(U²|X) implies σ² = E(U²) is reached. The clarification provided emphasizes that this conclusion stems from the homoskedasticity assumption. The thread highlights the complexities involved in understanding conditional expectations and their implications in statistical models.
Usagi
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, assume we have an equality involving 2 random variables U and X such that E(U|X) = E(U)=0, now I was told that this assumption implies that E(U^2|X) = E(U^2). However I'm not sure on how to prove this, if anyone could show me that'd be great!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Usagi said:
Hi guys, assume we have an equality involving 2 random variables U and X such that E(U|X) = E(U)=0, now I was told that this assumption implies that E(U^2|X) = E(U^2). However I'm not sure on how to prove this, if anyone could show me that'd be great!

Not sure this is true. Suppose \(U|(X=x) \sim N(0,x^2)\), and \(X\) has whatever distribution we like.

Then \(E(U|X=x)=0\) and \( \displaystyle E(U)=\int \int u f_{U|X=x}(u) f_X(x)\;dudx =\int E(U|X=x) f_X(x) \; dx=0\).

Now \(E(U^2|X=x)={\text{Var}}(U|X=x)=x^2\). While \( \displaystyle E(U^2)=\int E(U^2|X=x) f_X(x) \; dx= \int x^2 f_X(x) \; dx\).

Or have I misunderstood something?

CB
 
Hi CB,

Actually the problem arose from the following passage regarding the homoskedasticity assumption for simple linear regression:

http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/6892/asdfsdfc.jpg
I do not understand how they came to the conclusion that \sigma^2 = E(u^2|x) \implies \sigma^2 = E(u^2)

Thanks for your help!
 
Usagi said:
Hi CB,

Actually the problem arose from the following passage regarding the homoskedasticity assumption for simple linear regression:

http://img444.imageshack.us/img444/6892/asdfsdfc.jpg
I do not understand how they came to the conclusion that \sigma^2 = E(u^2|x) \implies \sigma^2 = E(u^2)

Thanks for your help!

It is the assumed homoskedasticity (that is what it means).

CB
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top