Proving Conjugacy of Subgroups in a G-set X

  • Thread starter Thread starter hsong9
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving the conjugacy of subgroups within a G-set X, specifically addressing two main points. First, it establishes that for an element x in X and an element b in G, the stabilizer of the element bx is given by the equation S(bx) = bS(x)b-1. Second, it demonstrates that if the stabilizers S(x) and S(y) are conjugate subgroups, then the sizes of the orbits |Gx| and |Gy| are equal, expressed as |Gx| = |Gy|. The discussion clarifies misconceptions regarding the implications of stabilizers and group actions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of G-sets and group actions
  • Familiarity with stabilizer subgroups in group theory
  • Knowledge of conjugate subgroups and their properties
  • Basic concepts of orbit-stabilizer theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Orbit-Stabilizer Theorem in detail
  • Learn about the properties of conjugate subgroups in group theory
  • Explore examples of G-sets and their stabilizers
  • Investigate the implications of group actions on set elements
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of abstract algebra, particularly those studying group theory, as well as mathematicians interested in the properties of G-sets and subgroup conjugacy.

hsong9
Messages
71
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Let X be a G-set and let x and y denoted elements of X.
a) If x in X and b in G, show that S(bx) = bS(x)b-1
b) If S(x) and S(y) are conjugate subgroups, show that |Gx| = |Gy|


The Attempt at a Solution


Let S(x) = {a in G | ax=x}
Let S(bx) = {a in G | abx=x} => abx = x => bx = x => bxb-1 = xb-1

bS(x)b-1 = baxb-1 = bxb-1 = xb-1

Thus S(bx) = bS(x)b-1

b) Since S(x) and S(y) are conjugate subgroups, |S(x)| = |S(y)|
so by |Gx|=|G:S(x)|, |Gx|=|Gy|
correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hsong9 said:
Let S(x) = {a in G | ax=x}
Let S(bx) = {a in G | abx=x}
=> abx = x
=> bx = x
=> bxb-1 = xb-1

No, that does not hold. That abx=x does not imply that bx=x, as that would mean that b stabilizes x which is certainly not (necessarily) true.



bS(x)b-1 = baxb-1 = bxb-1 = xb-1

Whoa, there. You've now equated a group with an element in a group.

Start again with b^-1abx = x and see what you can say.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K