Proving Conservative Force F(x,y): Steps & Examples

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the force F(x,y) = (x² + 3y + 11)î + (3x + 5y³ + 11)ĵ is conservative. Participants are exploring the necessary mathematical concepts, particularly the gradient and curl of vector fields.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the curl and gradient of the force vector, with some expressing confusion about the definitions and differences between these derivatives. There are attempts to clarify how to compute the curl given the vector form of the force.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on the definitions of gradient and curl. Some express uncertainty about how to apply these concepts to the specific form of the force given, and there is no clear consensus on the next steps.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention a lack of resources in their textbooks and class notes regarding the computation of the curl for a force expressed in vector notation, indicating potential gaps in available information.

KaiserBrandon
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


show that the force [tex]F(x,y) = (x^{2}+3y+11)\widehat{x} + (3x +5y^{3}+11)\widehat{y}[/tex] is conservative

Homework Equations


it's conservative if [tex]\nabla X F = 0[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


ok, I know how to take the gradient of a function like F(x,y) = x^2 + 3xy + 3 + y, but I'm not sure how to take the gradient of the function for this question. I've tried many things, including taking the partial derivative of x within the brackets next to the x unit vector, and the partial derivative of y within the brackets next to the y unit vector.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[itex]\mathbf{\nabla}\times\textbf{F}[/itex] represents the curl of [itex]\textbf{F}[/itex], not the gradient. I'm sure your textbook covers how to calculate a curl, so I suggest you open it up and read that section.
 
yes I know it represents the curl. I know how to find the curl if I have the gradient. But I'm stuck on the part where you have to find the gradient
 
Gradient and curl are two very different types of derivatives. The gradient takes a scalar function as input and outputs a vector function. The curl takes a vector function as input and outputs a vector function. You do not calculate the curl by first calculating the gradient.

You seem very confused on how to calculate the curl of a vector field, so again, I recommend you open your textbook and read the section on curls.
 
the curl is a cross product between the gradient of the force and the force itself. The textbook only tells me how to find the curl given a force in the form of say F(x,y) = x^2 + y^2 + 2, where the finding the gradient is straightforward, and so is using that to find the curl. however, for this question, the force is given in terms of
[tex]\widehat{x}, \widehat{y}[/tex]
I don't know how to do it using a force given in this way, and my textbook nor the class notes have any information either. And I can't find anything on the internet either.
 
KaiserBrandon said:
the curl is a cross product between the gradient of the force and the force itself.

No, it isn't. The gradient of a vector, like [itex]\textbf{F}[/itex], would be a second rank tensor (or matrix)...how exactly would you compute the cross product of a tensor/matrix with a vector?

The curl of [itex]\textbf{F}[/itex] is the cross product of the vector differential operator [itex]\mathbf{\nabla}=\hat{\mathbf{x}}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{\mathbf{y}}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{\mathbf{z}}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}[/itex] (often called the "Del operator" or "nabla operator") with [itex]\textbf{F}[/itex]. It can be represented by the following determinant:

[tex]\mathbf{\nabla}\times\textbf{F}=\begin{vmatrix}\hat{\mathbf{x}} & \hat{\mathbf{y}} & \hat{\mathbf{z}} \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial}{\partial y} & \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \\ F_x & F_y & F_z\end{vmatrix}=\left( \frac{\partial F_z}{\partial y}- \frac{\partial F_y}{\partial z}\right)\hat{\mathbf{x}}+\left( \frac{\partial F_x}{\partial z}- \frac{\partial F_z}{\partial x}\right)\hat{\mathbf{y}}+\left( \frac{\partial F_y}{\partial x}- \frac{\partial F_x}{\partial y}\right)\hat{\mathbf{z}}[/tex]


I don't know how to do it using a force given in this way, and my textbook nor the class notes have any information either. And I can't find anything on the internet either.

I can't believe that. What textbook are you using?
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
885
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K