Proving Continuous Function Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter lovemake1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
lovemake1
Messages
147
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Prove or give a counterexample for each of the following statements.

a) If f(x) is continuous, then the function lf(x)l is continuous.

b) if lf(x)l is continuous, then f(x) is continuous



Homework Equations



Given epsilon > 0 there is delta > 0 such that l x - c l < delta implies l f(x) - f(c) l < epsilon

The Attempt at a Solution


so we have to use the definition of continuity. ( lim x-> c f(x) = f(c) ) inaddition to
the delta epsilon method.

E = epsilon
S = delta
a)
lf(x) - cl < S implies lf(x) - f(c)l < E

lf(x) - f(c)l < E

f(c) - E < f(x) < f(c) + E

And since f(x) is continuos, we know that f(c) - E < lf(x)l < f(c) + E
will not change anything to the overall equation.

b) l lf(x)l - c l < S implies l lf(x)l - f(c) l < E

f(c) - E < lf(x)l < f(c) + E
this is continous, but if f(x) were -f(x)

f(c) - E < -f(x) < f(c) + E
this would change

-f(c) + E < f(x) < -f(c) - E

which is false, since -f(c) + E is bigger than -f(c) - E

is this right? please help !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, it seems you've got the right ideas. But I can't happen to follow your proof.

For 1. You need to find a [tex]\delta[/tex] such that

[tex]|x-c|<\delta~\Rightarrow~||f(x)|-|f(c)||<\epsilon[/tex]

It is true that [tex]||f(x)|-|f(c)||\leq |f(x)-f(c)|[/tex] (prove this!). Since f is continuous we can find a delta such that [tex]|f(x)-f(c)|[/tex] is smaller then epsilon. But the inequality then yields that [tex]||f(x)|-|f(c)||\leq \epsilon[/tex] and that is what you had to show.

For 2. You are correct that this statement is false. But you still need to come up with a counterexample. Try finding a discontinuous function f such that |f(x)|=1 for all x. (There are loads of other counterexamples, so it doesn't need to be this one).