Proving Dyadic Squares Interaction Rules

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the interaction rules of dyadic squares, specifically that any two planar dyadic cubes of the same size can only be identical, intersect along a common edge, intersect at a common vertex, or not intersect at all. Dyadic numbers are defined as rational numbers where the denominator is a power of 2, and dyadic intervals are formed from these numbers. The proof hinges on the fact that the length of any dyadic interval is represented as 1/2^k, leading to a unique determination of dyadic squares by integer coordinate pairs (a, b) within a dyadic lattice.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dyadic numbers and intervals
  • Familiarity with planar geometry and cubic structures
  • Knowledge of integer coordinate systems
  • Basic proof techniques in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of dyadic numbers and their applications in number theory
  • Explore the concept of dyadic intervals in greater depth
  • Learn about integer lattices and their significance in geometry
  • Investigate formal proof techniques to strengthen mathematical argumentation
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, students studying number theory, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of dyadic structures and their interactions in geometry.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


A rational number p/q is dyadic if q is a power of 2, q = 2k for some nonnegative
integer k. For example, 0, 3/8, 3/1, −3/256, are dyadic rationals, but 1/3, 5/12
are not. A dyadic interval is [a, b] where a = p/2k and b = (p + 1)/2k. For
example, [.75, 1] is a dyadic interval but [1, π], [0, 2], and [.25, .75] are not. A
dyadic cube is the product of dyadic intervals having equal length. The set of
dyadic rationals may be denoted as Q2 and the dyadic lattice as Qm2
.
Prove that any two dyadic squares (i.e., planar dyadic cubes) of the same
size are either identical, intersect along a common edge, intersect at a
common vertex, or do not intersect at all.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


After constructing many dyadic squares, I can intuitively see why this is true, but I don't know what a proof would really entail. How do I show in general that these are the 4 and only 4 ways dyadic squares could interact?

EDIT:
Actually, I might have a rough solution. The length of any dyadic interval is ##1/2^k##, hence, if any two dyadic squares have the same length, then it must be the case that they have the same value of k. Hence, any dyadic square is determined by an integer coordinate pair ##(a,b)## where ##[a/2^k, (a+1)/2^k] \times [b/2^k, (b+1)/2^k]## is an arbitrary dyadic square. Since ##a## and ##b## are integers, the possible dyadic squares of the same fixed length can be represented as occupying an integer lattice where all squares are unit squares in the lattice, which clearly shows that any two dyadic squares of the same size are either identical, intersect along a common edge, intersect at a common vertex, or do not intersect at all.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr Davis 97 said:

Homework Statement


A rational number p/q is dyadic if q is a power of 2, q = 2k for some nonnegative
integer k. For example, 0, 3/8, 3/1, −3/256, are dyadic rationals, but 1/3, 5/12
are not. A dyadic interval is [a, b] where a = p/2k and b = (p + 1)/2k. For
example, [.75, 1] is a dyadic interval but [1, π], [0, 2], and [.25, .75] are not. A
dyadic cube is the product of dyadic intervals having equal length. The set of
dyadic rationals may be denoted as Q2 and the dyadic lattice as Qm2
.
Prove that any two dyadic squares (i.e., planar dyadic cubes) of the same
size are either identical, intersect along a common edge, intersect at a
common vertex, or do not intersect at all.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


After constructing many dyadic squares, I can intuitively see why this is true, but I don't know what a proof would really entail. How do I show in general that these are the 4 and only 4 ways dyadic squares could interact?

EDIT:
Actually, I might have a rough solution. The length of any dyadic interval is ##1/2^k##, hence, if any two dyadic squares have the same length, then it must be the case that they have the same value of k. Hence, any dyadic square is determined by an integer coordinate pair ##(a,b)## where ##[a/2^k, (a+1)/2^k] \times [b/2^k, (b+1)/2^k]## is an arbitrary dyadic square. Since ##a## and ##b## are integers, the possible dyadic squares of the same fixed length can be represented as occupying an integer lattice where all squares are unit squares in the lattice, which clearly shows that any two dyadic squares of the same size are either identical, intersect along a common edge, intersect at a common vertex, or do not intersect at all.
Yes, I think that's good enough. A pedant might ask for a more rigorous proof of the last part.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K