Proving Equilibrium in a System of Forces Using Moment Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter kirab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moment Statics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving equilibrium in a system of forces using moment equations at points A, B, and C. The equations derived are: for point A, P(sin(90-theta))(2L) - M - Cx(sin(90-theta))(L) + Cy(sin(theta))(L) = 0; for point B, P(sin(theta))(2L) + Cx(sin(90-theta))(L) - Cy(sin(theta))(L) - M = 0; and for point C, P(sin(90-theta))(L) - M + P(sin(theta))(L) = 0. The user initially struggles with the equality of these equations but receives guidance on correctly applying equilibrium equations to simplify the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment equations in static equilibrium
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions in physics
  • Knowledge of free-body diagrams
  • Ability to solve simultaneous equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of moment equations in static equilibrium systems
  • Learn how to construct and analyze free-body diagrams
  • Explore the application of trigonometric identities in physics problems
  • Investigate methods for solving simultaneous equations in mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics and engineering, particularly those studying statics and dynamics, as well as professionals involved in structural analysis and mechanical design.

kirab
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Diagram is attached.

P = forces
M = free-moving moment
C = looks like a pin connection
L = distance between A and C, and C and B

With the system in equilibrium.

Question: Write the moment equations about point A, B and C and prove that they are all the same.

so basically I end up with:

(Counter-clockwise moment is positive.)

Summation of moments about point A: P(sin(90-theta))(2L) - M - Cx(sin(90-theta))(L) + Cy(sin(theta))(L) = 0

point B: P(sin(theta))(2L) + Cx(sin(90-theta))(L) - Cy(sin(theta))(L) - M = 0

point C: P(sin(90-theta))(L) - M + P(sin(theta))(L) = 0

which means that

P(cos(theta))(2L) - Cx(cos(theta))(L) + Cy(sin(theta))(L) = P(sin(theta))(2L) + Cx(cos(theta))(L) - Cy(sin(theta))(L) = P(cos(theta))(L) + P(sin(theta))(L) = M.

I don't see how these can be equal. Any mistakes seen here in the approach to solving this problem? Maybe pin supports Cx, Cy don't create moments?

Thanks for the help!
 

Attachments

  • Tut#3Q#2.jpg
    Tut#3Q#2.jpg
    18.2 KB · Views: 490
Physics news on Phys.org
Please post homework questions in the homework section of PF.
 
Your attempt is excellent. Cx and Cy (at the support point C) do create moments about B or A. A and B are not pin suppports, they are just the ends of the member that rotates about C under the applied forces and couple, until equilibrium is reached. Note that by applying the equilibrium equations sum of Fx = 0 and sum of Fy = 0, you can solve for Cx and Cy in terms of P. That will greatly simplify the equations in a manner that will clarify their equality.
 
Sorry for posting in the wrong sub-forum :(

Thanks for the help!

My issue is: when I do summation of forces in x and y, I get

P = (Cy(cos(theta)) + Cx(sin(theta)))/(cos(theta)+sin(theta)) from sum of Fx and

P = -(Cx(cos(theta))+Cy(sin(theta)))/(sin(theta)-cos(theta)).

Which I'm not sure if they're equal?

Either way, I plugged the 1st P into
P(cos(theta))(2L) - Cx(cos(theta))(L) + Cy(sin(theta))(L) and
P(sin(theta))(2L) + Cx(cos(theta))(L) - Cy(sin(theta))(L) and
P(cos(theta))(L) + P(sin(theta))(L)

(all equal to M, this is the last line of my initial post)

When I plugged P into those, I got a huge mess that doesn't clarify the equality. Any tips?

Thanks
 
kirab said:
Sorry for posting in the wrong sub-forum :(

Thanks for the help!

My issue is: when I do summation of forces in x and y, I get

P = (Cy(cos(theta)) + Cx(sin(theta)))/(cos(theta)+sin(theta)) from sum of Fx and

P = -(Cx(cos(theta))+Cy(sin(theta)))/(sin(theta)-cos(theta)).

Which I'm not sure if they're equal?

Either way, I plugged the 1st P into
P(cos(theta))(2L) - Cx(cos(theta))(L) + Cy(sin(theta))(L) and
P(sin(theta))(2L) + Cx(cos(theta))(L) - Cy(sin(theta))(L) and
P(cos(theta))(L) + P(sin(theta))(L)

(all equal to M, this is the last line of my initial post)

When I plugged P into those, I got a huge mess that doesn't clarify the equality. Any tips?

Thanks
I am not sure from where you are getting your sum of Fx and Fy equations. Cx and the upper P are the only 2 forces in the x direction, and Cy and the lower P are the only 2 forces in the y direction. So in the x direction, you have Cx -P =0, and in the y direction, you have Cy -P = 0. Solve for Cx and Cy.
 
PhanthomJay said:
I am not sure from where you are getting your sum of Fx and Fy equations. Cx and the upper P are the only 2 forces in the x direction, and Cy and the lower P are the only 2 forces in the y direction. So in the x direction, you have Cx -P =0, and in the y direction, you have Cy -P = 0. Solve for Cx and Cy.

OH! Yeah My sum of Fx and Fy came from looking at my altered diagram... which had the member lying horizontally, so I stupidly assumed that the x-coordinate system was horizontal and that the y-coordinate system was perpendicular to that, simply from looking at my diagram which has been rotated :P

Yes, with that P = Cx = Cy equation, it can be easily shown that sum of Ma = sum of Mb = sum of Mc. Thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
931
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K