MHB Proving Equivalence of f(x) and g(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter pappoelarry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalence
AI Thread Summary
To determine the equivalence of the functions f(x) and g(x), both must be simplified. The function f(x) simplifies to 3x² + 5x - 7, while g(x) simplifies to 3x² + 3x - 7. Since the coefficients of the x² terms are the same, but the coefficients of the x terms differ, f(x) and g(x) are not equivalent. Therefore, the two functions do not yield the same results. The conclusion is that f(x) and g(x) are not equivalent functions.
pappoelarry
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Consider the two functions f(x)=(x²+3x+10)+(2x²+2x-17) and g(x)=(4x²+4x+4)-(x²+x+11). If they are equivalent, prove they are; if they are not equivalent, prove they aren't.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The first function can be simplified by adding like terms: [math]f(x) = 3x^2 + 5x - 7[/math]. Do the same for g(x). Do they come out the same?

-Dan
 
pappoelarry said:
Consider the two functions f(x)=(x²+3x+10)+(2x²+2x-17) and g(x)=(4x²+4x+4)-(x²+x+11). If they are equivalent, prove they are; if they are not equivalent, prove they aren't.
f(x)=(x²+3x+10)+(2x²+2x-17)= (x^2+ 2x^2)+ (3x+ 2x)+(10- 17)
Can you finish that ?

g(x)=(4x²+4x+4)-(x²+x+11)= (4x^2- x^2)+ (4x- x)+ (4- 11)
Can you finish that?

Are they the same?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top