Proving Equivalence Statements in Real Analysis 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter phillyolly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Proof
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 2K views
phillyolly
Messages
157
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



See attachment

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



It is not a homework. I am just reviewing for myself.
This is the very first, basic problem of the first chapter of Real Analysis 1 by Bartle and Sherbert. Proofs of Real Analysis don't make any sense to me.
 

Attachments

  • pic.jpg
    pic.jpg
    3.8 KB · Views: 390
Physics news on Phys.org
The "if and only if" denotes an equivalence relation between the two statements, i.e., we have [tex](A \subseteq B) \longleftrightarrow (A \cap B = A).[/tex] There are two steps necessary to proving an equivalence statement:

1. Show [tex](A \subseteq B) \rightarrow (A \cap B = A).[/tex]
2. Show [tex](A \cap B = A) \rightarrow (A \subseteq B).[/tex]

For both parts, we begin by assuming the respective premise.
For 1, we need to show that [tex]x \in (A \cap B) \rightarrow x \in A[/tex] and that [tex]x \in A \rightarrow x \in (A \cap B).[/tex]
For 2, we just need to show that [tex]x \in A \rightarrow x \in B.[/tex]
Do all this, and you have yourself a proof!