Proving Fluid Flow Velocity & Vorticity Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the fluid flow velocity and vorticity equation, specifically the expression (u · ∇)u = -u × w + ∇(1/2|u|²). Participants emphasize the importance of using subscript notation for clarity in vector operations. The equation involves the gradient operator (∇) and the cross product of velocity (u) and vorticity (w), defined as w = ∆ × u. The conversation highlights the need for proper expansion of expressions using vector calculus identities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, particularly the gradient operator (∇)
  • Familiarity with fluid dynamics concepts, specifically velocity and vorticity
  • Proficiency in using subscript notation for vector operations
  • Knowledge of the product rule in vector calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the gradient operator (∇) in fluid dynamics
  • Learn about the properties and applications of vorticity in fluid flow
  • Explore vector calculus identities relevant to fluid mechanics
  • Practice using subscript notation in vector operations and expansions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fluid dynamics, mathematicians focusing on vector calculus, and anyone involved in deriving equations related to fluid flow and vorticity.

Fairy111
Messages
72
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For a fluid flow of velocity u and vorticity w=∆ x u, show that:

(u. ∆ )u=-u x w + ∆(1/2|u|²)

Sorry the triangles should be the other way up!




Homework Equations



∆(u.v)=(u.∆)v + (v.∆)u +u x (∆ x v) + v x (∆ x u )



The Attempt at a Solution


I need to show this using subscipt notation, but am really stuck, any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
here's how you write it correctly in tex - click it on the tex to see the expression
(u \cdot \nabla )u=-u \times w + \nabla (\frac{1}{2}|u|^2)

i would start by trying to expanding one of the expressions in your equation, use the equations and product rule expansions

by subscript notation do you mean like:
\textbf{u} \cdot \textbf{w} = u_i v_i

\textbf{u} \times \textbf{w} = u_i v_j \epsilon_{ijk}
 
Last edited:
I don't know how to expand the expression...Sorry I am really not very good at this area of maths.

but yes that is what i mean by subscript notation.
 
have a crack, I'm not just going to do it for you - how about starting with u x w?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K