Proving \frac{a+b}{2}\geq\sqrt{ab} for 0 < a \leq b

  • Thread starter Thread starter Government$
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The inequality \(\frac{a+b}{2} \geq \sqrt{ab}\) is proven valid for \(0 < a \leq b\) using the properties of arithmetic and geometric means. The discussion highlights that squaring both sides of the inequality leads to \((\frac{a+b}{2})^2 \geq ab\), which simplifies to \((a-b)^2 \geq 0\), confirming the inequality holds true. Additionally, it clarifies that one cannot infer the order of \(a\), \(b\), and \(c\) from the condition \(a, b, c > 0\) without additional context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic algebraic inequalities
  • Familiarity with the properties of arithmetic and geometric means
  • Knowledge of squaring inequalities
  • Basic concepts of positive integers and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and its applications
  • Learn about the AM-GM inequality in depth
  • Explore techniques for proving inequalities in mathematics
  • Investigate symmetric properties in inequalities involving multiple variables
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding inequalities and their proofs, particularly in algebra and number theory.

Government$
Messages
87
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show that \frac{a+b}{2}\geq\sqrt{ab} for 0 &lt; a \leq b

The Attempt at a Solution



Since b \geq a then b + a \geq 2a and 2b\geq a + b
That is \frac{a+b}{2}\geq a and \frac{a+b}{2}\leq b.

Since \frac{a+b}{2}\leq b can i multiply \frac{a+b}{2}\geq a with b?

If i can do that then (\frac{a+b}{2})^{2}\geq ab that is:
\frac{a+b}{2}\geq \sqrt{ab}


On a side note if problem says prove something for all positive intigers a,b and c.
That means that a>0 , b>0, c>0 but can i take from that, a\geq b\geq c &gt; 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you go from b\frac{a+b}{2}\geq abto (\frac{a+b}{2})^{2} \geq ab?
You could just square both the right and left side from the start, so that
0.25a^{2}+0.5ab+0.25b^{2} \geq ab \leftrightarrow 0.25a^{2}+0.25b^{2} \geq 0.5 ab \leftrightarrow a^{2}+b^{2}-2ab \geq 0 \leftrightarrow (a-b)^{2} \geq0 which obviously is true.
 
As for your last question, that does not tell you very much. It tels you that a is larger than or equal to b which is larger than or equal to c which is larger than 0. A more concise way to express the stipulation is to write
a,b,c \in N
or
a,b,c \in Z^{+}
 
Well i thought that since b≥ (a+b)/2 and (a+b)/2 * b = ((a+b)/2)^2 (because it can be b = (a+b)/2)
 
Government$ said:
Well i thought that since b≥ (a+b)/2 and (a+b)/2 * b = ((a+b)/2)^2 (because it can be b = (a+b)/2)
But you can't treat this as an equality, which is what you seem to be doing.
 
Government$ said:
Since \frac{a+b}{2}\leq b can i multiply \frac{a+b}{2}\geq a with b?

If i can do that then (\frac{a+b}{2})^{2}\geq ab that is:
\frac{a+b}{2}\geq \sqrt{ab}

You can't do this: the inequality signs face different ways.

If ##a \geq b## and ##c \geq d##, then for positive a,b,c and d, you CAN assert that ##ac \geq bd##. If that's a ##\leq## sign, then the opposite applies (just switch all the signs). However, if the signs are different you cannot conclude anything from multiplying the two inequalities.

The simplest way to approach this is to start by observing that ##(\sqrt{a} - \sqrt{b})^2 \geq 0## for all ##a,b \in \mathbb{R^+}## (positive real a and b).

On a side note if problem says prove something for all positive intigers a,b and c.
That means that a>0 , b>0, c>0 but can i take from that, a\geq b\geq c &gt; 0?

No you cannot infer that. You can only say that a, b and c are all greater than 0, but you cannot conclude anything about how they're ordered with respect to one another.

However, if a, b and c are *arbitrary* positive integers, and the property you're required to prove is essentially symmetric in a, b, and c (i.e. switching the symbols around doesn't matter), then you can start by arguing "without loss of generality, let ##a \geq b \geq c > 0##" if it helps your proof. This is a common technique.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K