Proving Inductive Step: P(k) to P(k+1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chromium
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the inductive step in mathematical induction for the formula P(n): 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n-1) = n^2. The proof begins with P(1), confirming it is true. The inductive hypothesis P(k) is established as 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2k-1) = k^2, leading to the proof of P(k + 1) by demonstrating that (2k-1) + (2k + 1) equals (k+1)^2. The participants express confusion regarding the inductive step's variability across problems, emphasizing the need for clarity in proving the transition from P(k) to P(k + 1).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with sequences and series
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of quadratic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in depth
  • Explore examples of inductive proofs in number theory
  • Learn about the role of the induction hypothesis in proofs
  • Investigate common pitfalls in proving inductive steps
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators teaching induction methods, and anyone interested in enhancing their proof-writing skills in algebra and number theory.

Chromium
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
P(n): 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n-1) = n^2

Prove P(1)
P(1) = 1 = 1^2
P(1) is true

(A) P(k): 1 + 3 + 5 +...+ (2k-1) = k^2

(B) P(k + 1): 1 + 3 + 5 +...+ (2k-1) + (2(k+1)-1)
or
(2k-1) + (2k + 1) = (k+1)^2

Assuming A, prove B

(2k-1) = k^2
(2(k+1)-1) = (k+1)(k+1)
(2k + 1) = (k^2 + 2k+ 2)
= (k+1)^2

When in comes to the inductive step, does it "differ" from problem to problem? I can always get to the inductive assumption, but then I'm never sure just how to go about proving it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chromium said:
P(n): 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n-1) = n^2

Prove P(1)
P(1) = 1 = 1^2
P(1) is true

(A) P(k): 1 + 3 + 5 +...+ (2k-1) = k^2

(B) P(k + 1): 1 + 3 + 5 +...+ (2k-1) + (2(k+1)-1)
or
(2k-1) + (2k + 1) = (k+1)^2
I'm, sorry? how does 1+ 3+ ...+ 2(k+1)= (2k-1)+ 2k?

Assuming A, prove B

(2k-1) = k^2
(2(k+1)-1) = (k+1)(k+1)
(2k + 1) = (k^2 + 2k+ 2)
= (k+1)^2

When in comes to the inductive step, does it "differ" from problem to problem? I can always get to the inductive assumption, but then I'm never sure just how to go about proving it.
You want to prove that "P(k)= (k+1)^2. P(k+1)= P(k)+ 2k+1 for every k. The "induction hypothesis" is that P(k-1)= k^2 . From that, P(k+1)= P(k)+ k+1= k^2+ 2k+ 1= (k+1)^2/
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K