Proving Inequalities: Tips & Tricks from Dave

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter daviddoria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequalities
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving inequalities, specifically the approach to demonstrate that ln(1+a) ≤ a²b. The user, Dave, expresses difficulty in systematically proving such inequalities and seeks principled methods. A suggested method involves manipulating the inequality by exponentiating both sides, leading to a transformation that allows for logical reasoning about the behavior of the terms as variables grow. The discussion emphasizes the importance of algebraic manipulation and logical deduction in proving inequalities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of natural logarithms and their properties
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their behavior
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of limits and asymptotic behavior in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of logarithmic and exponential functions
  • Learn techniques for manipulating inequalities in mathematical proofs
  • Explore asymptotic analysis and its applications in proving inequalities
  • Review examples of common inequalities and their proofs, such as Jensen's inequality
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, students studying advanced calculus or analysis, and anyone interested in mastering the techniques of proving mathematical inequalities.

daviddoria
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
I never have much luck when something says "prove something <= something else". I usually just fiddle around and occasionally get lucky and reduce it to a constant < an express I know can't be less than that constant. But most times I can't reduce it to something like that. Is there any kind of "principled" approach that someone can suggest/ point me to read about?

As an example, say it was something like
ln(1+a) \leq a^2 b

How would you approach something like this?

Thanks,

Dave
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You can, in general, use any number of arguments to show something like that.

For the natural log one, just raise e to both sides. Then you get

1 + a = exp(b*a^2)

Then you can write

1 = exp(b*a^2) - a.

I don't know... then just pull out an exponential term and get

1 = exp(b*a^2)(1 - a*exp(-b*a^2)) and argue that, as either A or b grow without bound, the right hand simplifies to exp(b*a^2) and the left remains constant. And for a, b both positive, this is clearly true.

I mean, it's just algebra, some logic, and knowing what you're trying to show. Does that help?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 116 ·
4
Replies
116
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K