Proving inequality: Can we show n^n * (n+1)/2)^2n ≥ (n+1)/2)^3?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter juantheron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The inequality $$n^n \cdot \left(\frac{n+1}{2}\right)^{2n} \geq \left(\frac{n+1}{2}\right)^3$$ holds for all integers \( n \geq 1 \). For \( n \geq 3 \), it is established that \( n^n > n^3 \) due to the strictly increasing nature of the function \( a^x \) for \( a > 1 \). The left-hand side grows significantly faster than the right-hand side as \( n \) increases, confirming the inequality. Additionally, the case for \( n < 3 \) can be verified manually, as the inequality holds true for these values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential functions and their growth rates
  • Familiarity with logarithmic properties and inequalities
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical induction (though not required for this proof)
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of exponential growth and how they apply to inequalities
  • Learn about logarithmic functions and their applications in proving inequalities
  • Explore mathematical induction techniques for proving inequalities
  • Investigate general proofs for inequalities involving polynomial and exponential terms
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying inequalities, educators teaching algebra and calculus, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical proofs.

juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
How can we prove $$n^n\cdot \left(\frac{n+1}{2}\right)^{2n}\geq \left(\frac{n+1}{2}\right)^3$$

I did not understand from where i have start.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
jacks said:
How can we prove $$n^n\cdot \left(\frac{n+1}{2}\right)^{2n}\geq \left(\frac{n+1}{2}\right)^3$$
At least for $n\ge3$ we have $n>\dfrac{n+1}{2}$, so $n^n>\left(\dfrac{n+1}{2}\right)^3$. Also, $\left(\dfrac{n+1}{2}\right)^{2n}>1$, so it makes the left-hand side even bigger. In general, $n^n$ grows much faster than $n^3$, so it dominates the right-hand side for large $n$.
 
http://mathhelpboards.com/members/evgeny-makarov/ Thanks, But How i can prove $n^n>n^3$ for $n\geq 3$ without Using Induction.
 
That should be $n^n\ge n^3,n\ge3$. Taking logs base $n$,

$n\ge3$
 
jacks said:
How i can prove $n^n>n^3$ if $n\geq 3$ without Using Induction.
The general fact is that the function $a^x$ is strictly increasing for $a>1$ (and strictly decreasing if $0<a<1$). Therefore, $n\ge3$ implies $n^n\ge n^3$ (here $a=n$). For integer $n$ is it obvious because $n^n=n^{n-3}n^3\ge n^3$ because $n^{n-3}=\underbrace{n\cdot\ldots\cdot n}_{n-3\text{ times}}$ and $n-3\ge0$. We have a product of numbers, each of which is greater than 1, and then we multiply the result by $n^3$. It boils down to the property $x>1,y>0\implies xy>y$.
 
Thanks Evgeny and Greg, But i have a doubt , Here $$\displaystyle n^n\cdot \left(\frac{n+1}{2}\right)^n\geq \left(\frac{n+1}{2}\right)^n$$ equality hold for $n=1$

But In your solution you have mention that $n\geq 3$. I did not Understand that.
 
jacks said:
Here $$\displaystyle n^n\cdot \left(\frac{n+1}{2}\right)^n\geq \left(\frac{n+1}{2}\right)^n$$ equality hold for $n=1$
How does it help prove the original inequality?

jacks said:
But In your solution you have mention that $n\geq 3$. I did not Understand that.
This is a wrong thing not to understand. A reasonable thing is not to get a particular part of a proof that is shown to you. For example, it is OK to ask, "How does this inequality follow from the previous one?" But it does not make much sense not to understand something that has not been proved.

I indeed omitted the case when $n< 3$. It is trivial to manually check that the inequality holds for those values of $n$. With some thought it may be possible to construct a single general proof, which does not make a distinction whether $n\ge 3$ or not. Indeed, $\left(\frac{n+1}{2}\right)^{2n}\geq \left(\frac{n+1}{2}\right)^3$ for all $n\ge1$ because for $n=1$ both sides equal 1, but for $n\ge2$ we have $2n>3$.
 
Thanks evgeny Now i have got it.

Yes you are saying Right actually i have a problem for $n < 3$

and I appolozise for using such word.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
985
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K