Proving Linear Injectivity in Finite-Dimensional Vector Spaces

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the existence of a linear injective map between finite-dimensional vector spaces V and U. Participants explore the conditions necessary for such a map to exist, particularly focusing on the relationship between the dimensions of the two vector spaces and the role of the kernel in establishing injectivity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially seeks clarification on how to prove the existence of a linear injective map from V to U, suggesting that the kernel may be relevant.
  • Another participant corrects the terminology, emphasizing that the correct phrasing is "there exists a linear injective map from V to U," and states that this is true if the dimension of V is less than or equal to that of U.
  • A different participant reiterates the importance of understanding injective maps, explaining that it requires showing that no two distinct vectors in V map to the same vector in U.
  • One participant suggests that once an ordered basis is chosen for both spaces, a matrix representation can be established for the linear map, although this may depend on the professor's expectations regarding the use of matrices.
  • Another participant provides a construction of the linear map by associating basis vectors of V to basis vectors of U, asserting that the map is defined as long as the dimension of V is less than or equal to that of U.
  • It is noted that a linear map is injective if its kernel consists only of the zero vector, linking back to the initial mention of the kernel.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the condition that the dimension of V must be less than or equal to that of U for a linear injective map to exist. However, there is some disagreement regarding the terminology and the necessity of matrix representations in the proof process.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of not using matrices or sets in the proof, indicating that the discussion may depend on specific academic expectations or definitions.

Servarus
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, new to the forum but hoping you can help.

How do you prove that vector spaces V and U have a linear injective map given V is finite dimensional. I got the linear part but cannot really figure out the injectivity part, although I am thinking that it has to do with the kernel.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"V and U have a linear injective map" makes no sense. Two spaces do not have a "linear injective map". Do you mean "there exist a linear injective map from V to U"? That is true if and only if the dimension of V is less than or equal to the dimension of U. And you prove it by "associating" a unique basis vector of U to every basis vector of V and ignoring any that are left over. Map each basis vector of V into its associated basis vector or V.
 
Servarus said:
Hey guys, new to the forum but hoping you can help.

How do you prove that vector spaces V and U have a linear injective map given V is finite dimensional. I got the linear part but cannot really figure out the injectivity part, although I am thinking that it has to do with the kernel.

Thanks in advance.

Like Halls said, be careful with your terminology.

Do you understand what an injective map (sometimes called a one-to-one map) is to begin with? You simply need to show that no two vectors map to the same place. Or in symbols, that given v1 and v2 are vectors in V, if v1 /= v2, then f(v1) /= f(v2).

The key ideas in your proof will be the following:

The map you're looking for is linear. That means it is fully defined simply by finding f(b1), f(b2), ..., f(bN) for any basis {b1, b2, ..., bN} for V. This means that f(b1), f(b2), ..., f(bN) are N vectors in U. Ask yourself: are these vectors eligible to be a basis for U? Are they enough of them? Can I choose f so that they are all linearly independent?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Do you mean "there exist a linear injective map from V to U"?

I apologize, yes I did mean there exists a linear injective map from V to U. And what I am really trying to figure out is how you prove that there does exist a linear injective map when there are no matrices or sets that have to do with either of vector space.
 
Servarus said:
And what I am really trying to figure out is how you prove that there does exist a linear injective map when there are no matrices or sets that have to do with either of vector space.

Again, be careful with your terminology =-) What do you mean when you say there are no matrices or sets that "have to do" with either vector space?

As soon as you choose an ordered basis for both spaces, you have a column-vector representation for every vector in the space and a matrix representation for every linear map between the two spaces.

Of course, it all depends on what your professor expects of you. If he or she doesn't want you to talk about matrix representations, then you might have to jump through hoops, even if you already have an otherwise legitimate proof.
 
As I said before, in order that there exist a linear injective map from V to U, V must have dimension less than or equal to the dimension of U. In that case, let [itex]\{v_i\}[/itex], i= 1 to m, be a basis for V and let [itex]\{u_i\}[/itex], i= 1 to n, be a basis for U. Of course, m must be less than or equal to n.

Now define A:V->U by: [itex]A(v_i)= u_i[/itex] for i from 1 to m. For any v in V, [itex]A(v)= A(a_1v_1+ a_2v_2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_mv_m)[/itex][itex]= a_1A(v_1)+ a_2A(v_2)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_mA(v_m)[/itex][itex]= a_1u_1+ a_2u_2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_mu_m[/itex]. That maps V onto the m dimensional subspace in U having [itex]\{u_i\}[/itex] for i= 1 to m as basis.

Since you mentioned "kernel" in your first post, a linear map is injective if and only if its kernel is the "trivial" subspace consisting of only the 0 vector.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Alright, I finally understand.

Thank you both so much for all the help. It has been quite invaluable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K