Proving Logarithmic Rule: log_a(x^k)=klog_ax

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hypochondriac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithmic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The logarithmic rule log_a(x^k) = k log_a(x) is proven by letting y = log_a(x), which transforms the equation into exponential form a^y = x. By raising both sides to the power of k, we derive a^(yk) = x^k. Taking the logarithm of both sides yields log_a(a^(yk)) = log_a(x^k), simplifying to yk = log_a(x^k). Substituting back for y confirms the rule as k log_a(x) = log_a(x^k), completing the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic functions and properties
  • Familiarity with exponential equations
  • Knowledge of the logarithmic identity log_a(a^b) = b
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of logarithms, including change of base and product rules
  • Explore advanced logarithmic identities and their applications
  • Practice solving logarithmic equations and inequalities
  • Learn about the graphical representation of logarithmic functions
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for mathematics exams, educators teaching logarithmic concepts, and anyone seeking to strengthen their understanding of logarithmic properties and proofs.

Hypochondriac
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
prove:
log_a(x^k)=klog_ax

i can do the addition and subtraction rules no problem, but for some reason I'm stuggling with this one,
just point me in the right direction, or help with the whole thing I'm not bothered, i just hope it aint in my exam tomorrow lol
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, one way of doing it is to write log(x^k) as log(x.x.x...x) [where there are k x's in the argument of the logarithm]. Then invoke the rule log(ab)=log(a)+log(b). Of course this only works for positive integers!

A better proof is to let y=log_a(x), so that a^y=x. Then x^k=(a^y)^k=a^(yk). Hence, log_a(x^k)=ky=k log_a(x).
 
thanks
but to get from x^k = a^(yk)
to log_a(x^k) = ky

you would need to go via the rule I'm trying to prove
ie log_a(x^k) = log_a(a^ky) = ky log_a(a) = 1ky
so i didnt know if that was a feasible move
 
No, you do not have to use the log rule that you are trying to prove to continue...

You want to prove: loga xk = k loga x

Proof:

(1) First, let y = loga x

(2) Rewite (1) in exponential form using anti-log: ay = x

(3) Next, add exponent k to both side and we have: ayk = xk

(4) Now you "log" both side to have: loga ayk = loga xk

(by logging both side you do not use the log rule you are trying to prove)​

(5) but we know the log rule said: logaayk = yk

(6) so (4) becomes: yk = loga xk

(7) but (1) said y = loga x

(8) so (6) becomes (loga x ) (k) = loga xk

(9) Re-arrange the left, we have: k loga x = loga xk

(10) Proof complete QED
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
9K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K