MHB Proving Miquel's Theorem: Need Help!

  • Thread starter Thread starter pholee95
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
pholee95
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I don't know how to start proving this theorem, so can someone please help? I need to prove that the circumcircles all intersect at a point M. Thank you!

Miquel's Theorem: If triangleABC is any triangle, and points D, E, F are chosen in the interiors of the sides BC, AC, and AB, respectively, then the circumcircles for triangleAEF, triangleBDF, and triangleCDE intersect in a point M.

I have attached here the figure of theorem.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2016-11-21 at 11.01.41 AM.png
    Screenshot 2016-11-21 at 11.01.41 AM.png
    11.1 KB · Views: 112
Mathematics news on Phys.org
pholee95 said:
I don't know how to start proving this theorem, so can someone please help? I need to prove that the circumcircles all intersect at a point M. Thank you!

Miquel's Theorem: If triangleABC is any triangle, and points D, E, F are chosen in the interiors of the sides BC, AC, and AB, respectively, then the circumcircles for triangleAEF, triangleBDF, and triangleCDE intersect in a point M.

I have attached here the figure of theorem.
Have you looked at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miquel's_theorem? The trick seems to be to take $M$ to be the point where two of the three circles meet, draw the lines $MD$, $ME$ and $MF$, then use properties of cyclic quadrilaterals to show that $M$ also lies on the third circle.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top