MHB Proving Modulus Inequality for Complex Numbers

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the modulus inequality for complex numbers, specifically when the moduli of two complex numbers differ. The initial poster seeks guidance on how to demonstrate that the ratio of the real part of the sum of two complex numbers is less than or equal to a specific fraction involving their moduli. Responses highlight the importance of using triangle inequalities and properties of complex numbers, such as the relationship between a complex number's real part and its modulus. Ultimately, the conclusion emphasizes that by applying these inequalities, the desired inequality can be successfully proven. The discussion effectively illustrates the application of complex analysis principles to solve the problem.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everyone,

I am currently in an Introduction to Complex Analysis; I have a question:

Use established properties of moduli to show that when $\left|{z_3}\right|\ne\left|{z_4}\right|$:
$\frac{\Re{({z}_{1}+{z}_{2})}}{\left|{z}_{3}+{z}_{4}\right|}\le\frac{\left| {z}_{1} \right|+\left| {z}_{2} \right|}{\left| \left| {z}_{3} \right|-\left| {z}_{4} \right| \right|}$

My work:
Let ${z}_{1},{z}_{2}\in\Bbb{C}$ and ${z}_{3}, {z}_{4}$ be non-zero complex numbers.

I am stuck.

Thanks
CBarker1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cbarker1 said:
Dear Everyone,

I am currently in an Introduction to Complex Analysis; I have a question:

Use established properties of moduli to show that when $\left|{z_3}\right|\ne\left|{z_4}\right|$:
$\frac{\Re{({z}_{1}+{z}_{2})}}{\left|{z}_{3}+{z}_{4}\right|}\le\frac{\left| {z}_{1} \right|+\left| {z}_{2} \right|}{\left| \left| {z}_{3} \right|-\left| {z}_{4} \right| \right|}$

My work:
Let ${z}_{1},{z}_{2}\in\Bbb{C}$ and ${z}_{3}, {z}_{4}$ be non-zero complex numbers.

I am stuck.

Thanks
CBarker1

Hi Cbarker1,

Have you considered the triangle inequalities?
With complex numbers they are:
$$\begin{array}{} |z_1| + |z_2| \ge |z_1+z_2| & \text{Sum of 2 sides of a triangle}\ge\text{3rd side}\\
\Big||z_1|-|z_2|\Big| \le |z_1+z_2| & \text{Difference of 2 sides of a triangle}\le\text{3rd side}\\
\operatorname{Re} z \le |z| & \text{Rectangular side in a right triangle}\le \text{hypotenuse}
\end{array}$$

How far can you get with them?
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Cbarker1,

Have you considered the triangle inequalities?
With complex numbers they are:
$$\begin{array}{} |z_1| + |z_2| \ge |z_1+z_2| & \text{Sum of 2 sides of a triangle}\ge\text{3rd side}\\
\Big||z_1|-|z_2|\Big| \le |z_1+z_2| & \text{Difference of 2 sides of a triangle}\le\text{3rd side}\\
\operatorname{Re} z \le |z| & \text{Rectangular side in a right triangle}\le \text{hypotenuse}
\end{array}$$

How far can you get with them?

I believe the solution is this:
$\frac{\Re{({z}_{1}+{z}_{2}})}{\left|{z}_{3}+{z}_{4}\right|}\le\frac{\left| {z}_{1}\right|+\left|{z}_{2} \right|}{\left|\left| {z}_{3} \right|-\left| {z}_{4} \right|\right|}$. By the triangle inequality and reverse triangle inequality, the inequality yields
$\le\frac{\left| {z}_{1}+{z}_{2} \right|}{\left|{z}_{3}+{z}_{4}\right|}$
By the $\operatorname{Re}{z}\le\left| z \right|$, then the inequality yields
$\le\frac{\operatorname{Re}{({z}_{1}+{z}_{2}})}{\left|{z}_{3}+{z}_{4}\right|}$ QED
 
Cbarker1 said:
I believe the solution is this:
$\frac{\Re{({z}_{1}+{z}_{2}})}{\left|{z}_{3}+{z}_{4}\right|}\le\frac{\left| {z}_{1}\right|+\left|{z}_{2} \right|}{\left|\left| {z}_{3} \right|-\left| {z}_{4} \right|\right|}$. By the triangle inequality and reverse triangle inequality, the inequality yields
$\le\frac{\left| {z}_{1}+{z}_{2} \right|}{\left|{z}_{3}+{z}_{4}\right|}$
By the $\operatorname{Re}{z}\le\left| z \right|$, then the inequality yields
$\le\frac{\operatorname{Re}{({z}_{1}+{z}_{2}})}{\left|{z}_{3}+{z}_{4}\right|}$ QED

You seem to be going backwards, rather than forwards, in your argument. The goal is to show $\displaystyle \frac{\Re(z_1 + z_2)}{|z_3 + z_4|} \le \frac{|z_1| + |z_2|}{||z_3| - |z_4||}$. Since $\Re z \le |z|$ for all complex numbers $z$, $\displaystyle \frac{\Re(z_1 + z_2)}{|z_3 + z_4|} \le \frac{|z_1 + z_2|}{|z_3 + z_4|}$. The triangle and reverse triangle inequalities yields $|z_1 + z_2| \le |z_1| + |z_2|$ and $|z_3 + z_4| \ge ||z_3| - |z_4||$; hence $\displaystyle \frac{|z_1 + z_2|}{|z_3 + z_4|} \le \frac{|z_1| + |z_2|}{||z_3| - |z_4||}$, as desired.
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K