MHB Proving N(H) is a Subgroup of G Containing H

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jen917
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subgroup
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the discussion, the group N(H) is defined as N(H)={x∈G|xhx-1 ∈H for all h∈H}, where G is a group and H is a subgroup. The participants aim to prove that N(H) is a subgroup of G containing H by demonstrating closure under group operations and the existence of inverses. A key point raised is the necessity of H being finite for certain proofs, and the discussion also explores the implications of the function H→H defined by h ↦ xhx⁻¹ being a bijection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically subgroups.
  • Familiarity with group operations and properties such as closure and inverses.
  • Knowledge of bijective functions in the context of group homomorphisms.
  • Basic understanding of finite groups and their characteristics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of normal subgroups in group theory.
  • Learn about group homomorphisms and their implications on subgroup structures.
  • Explore the concept of finite groups and their subgroup classifications.
  • Investigate the relationship between bijections and group actions.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and researchers in abstract algebra, particularly those studying group theory, subgroup properties, and normalizers within groups.

Jen917
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Let G be a group and let H be a subgroup.

Define N(H)={x∈G|xhx-1 ∈H for all h∈H}. Show that N(H) is a subgroup of G which contains H.

To be a subgroup I know N(H) must close over the operations and the inverse, but I am not sure hot to show that in this case.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jen917 said:
Let G be a group and let H be a subgroup.

Define N(H)={x∈G|xhx-1 ∈H for all h∈H}. Show that N(H) is a subgroup of G which contains H.

To be a subgroup I know N(H) must close over the operations and the inverse, but I am not sure hot to show that in this case.

Hi Jen917! Welcome to MHB! (Smile)

To prove that the operation is closed, we need to prove that for all $x, y \in N(H)$:
$$\forall h \in H: (xy)h(xy)^{-1} \overset ?\in H$$
Can we find that using $xhx^{-1} \in H$ and $yhy^{-1} \in H$? (Wondering)To prove that the inverse belongs to the set, we need a sub step first.
Either way, it requires that $H$ is finite. Is it?

Suppose $x$ is an element of $N(H)$.
Now consider the function $H\to H$ given by $h \mapsto xhx^{-1}$.
Is it a bijection? (Wondering)
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
565
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
888
Replies
1
Views
1K