Proving Openness of a Set in n-Dimensional Space | Math Proof

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stauros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the openness of the set defined as \( A = \{ \vec{x} \in \mathbb{R}^n : x_n > 0 \} \). The proof begins by selecting a point \( \vec{x} \in A \) and choosing \( \epsilon \) such that \( 0 < \epsilon < x_n \). The participants clarify that the ball \( B(\vec{x}, \epsilon) \) must be contained within \( A \), ensuring that all points \( \vec{y} \) within this ball maintain the condition \( y_n > 0 \). The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly defining the norm \( ||\vec{y} - \vec{x}|| \) and ensuring that \( \epsilon \) is less than the minimum of the coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of n-dimensional Euclidean space
  • Familiarity with the concept of open sets in topology
  • Knowledge of the Euclidean norm and its properties
  • Ability to work with inequalities and limits in mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of open sets in topology
  • Learn about the Euclidean norm and its applications in n-dimensional spaces
  • Explore the concept of balls in metric spaces and their significance
  • Investigate common proof techniques used in real analysis and topology
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of open sets in n-dimensional spaces.

stauros
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Prove if the following set is open

\displaystyle{A=\begin{cases}<br /> \vec{x}=(x_1,...,x_n)\in\mathbb{R}^n:x_n&gt;0\\<br /> \end{cases}} .


I have written the following proof and please correct me if i am wrong

Let : \displaystyle{\vec{x}\in A}


Then we have : \displaystyle{\vec{x}=(x_1,...,x_n)} with \displaystyle{x_n&gt;0}

Choose \epsilon such that \displaystyle{0&lt;\epsilon&lt;x_n} and then \displaystyle{B(\vec{x},\epsilon)\subseteq A}


This happens because if \displaystyle{\vec{y}=(y_1,...,y_n)\in B(\vec{x},\epsilon)} then \displaystyle{||\vec{y}-\vec{x}||&lt;\epsilon}

and \displaystyle{y_i\in\left(x_i-\epsilon,x_i+\epsilon\right)}

Then we have \displaystyle{y_n\in\left(x_n-\epsilon,x_n+\epsilon\right)} and thus \displaystyle{y_n&gt;0}[/quote]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stauros said:
Prove if the following set is open

\displaystyle{A=\begin{cases}<br /> \vec{x}=(x_1,...,x_n)\in\mathbb{R}^n:x_n&gt;0\\<br /> \end{cases}} .


I have written the following proof and please correct me if i am wrong

Let : \displaystyle{\vec{x}\in A}


Then we have : \displaystyle{\vec{x}=(x_1,...,x_n)} with \displaystyle{x_n&gt;0}

Choose \epsilon such that \displaystyle{0&lt;\epsilon&lt;x_n} and then \displaystyle{B(\vec{x},\epsilon)\subseteq A}
That makes no sense because there is no one number labeled "x_n". What you mean to say is that \epsilon&lt; min(x_n).


This happens because if \displaystyle{\vec{y}=(y_1,...,y_n)\in B(\vec{x},\epsilon)} then \displaystyle{||\vec{y}-\vec{x}||&lt;\epsilon}
Can you prove this? That is, after all the whole point of the exercise! In particular, what is the definition of ||\vec{y}-\vec{x}||?

and \displaystyle{y_i\in\left(x_i-\epsilon,x_i+\epsilon\right)}

Then we have \displaystyle{y_n\in\left(x_n-\epsilon,x_n+\epsilon\right)} and thus \displaystyle{y_n&gt;0}
 
HallsofIvy said:
That makes no sense because there is no one number labeled "x_n". What you mean to say is that \epsilon&lt; min(x_n).



Can you prove this? That is, after all the whole point of the exercise! In particular, what is the definition of ||\vec{y}-\vec{x}||?


Yes you right,how about the inequality: \displaystyle{0&lt;\epsilon&lt;x_k, \forall 1\le k \le n}.

But i think the center point of the problem is that:

|x_{i}-y_{i}|\leq ||x_{i}-y_{i}||&lt;\epsilon using the Euclidian norm
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K