Proving Rational Solutions in Linear Systems with Rational Coefficients

  • Thread starter Thread starter e(ho0n3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rational
Click For Summary
A linear system of equations with rational coefficients and constants will have at least one all-rational solution if it has any solution. The argument hinges on the fact that if the right-hand side (RHS) is rational, then the left-hand side (LHS) must also be rational, ensuring rational solutions. While the system may not have infinitely many rational solutions, it can, particularly if free variables are involved. The discussion also highlights that if a rational solution exists, it leads to a rational equation that can be analyzed through the kernel of the matrix involved. Ultimately, the conclusion is that all solutions to the system will be rational.
e(ho0n3
Messages
1,349
Reaction score
0
I need some closure on the following,

Question:
Prove that if a linear system of equations with only rational coefficients and constants has a solution then it has at least one all-rational solution. Must it have infinitely many?

My Solution:
If the RHS of the equations is a rational number, then the sum of the terms of the LHS must be rational, so the terms must be rational and hence the solution must be rational right? The only reason this argument wouldn't work is if the RHS is equal to 0. Must if have infinitely many rational solutions? No, but it can though (if the form of the solution includes some free variables, picking rational numbers for the free variables will produce a rational solution).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If ##Ax=b## with rational ##A,b## has a rational solution which is not rational, then we would have a ##\mathbb{Q}-##linear combination of at least one non rational number, w.l.o.g. ##x_1## with ##a_{11}\neq 0## and ##a_{11}x_1+\ldots +a_{1n}x_n= b_1##. However, this is only possible, if other terms eliminate ##a_{11}x_1## which makes the new solution rational.

Now we have a rational equation ##Ax_b=b##, which leads to ##Ay=0## with new variables ##y=x-x_b##. We can now restrict ##A## onto its image and get a regular matrix ##A'=\left.A\right|_{\operatorname{im}A}## and an equation ##A'y'=0## which means ##y'=0##. So we need to consider the kernel of ##A##. With the same argument as above we get a rational basis of this kernel. All combined, we have only rational solutions of ##Ax=b##.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K