leigh ramona said:
So reflexive is equal to each other. Like x R x.
Your sentence does not make sense because it lacks the subject:
what is equal to each other?. And when you say $xRx$, I'll ask you: what is $x$? Do you mean $xRx$ holds for some unspecified $x$, for all $x$, for some specific $x$? What set does $x$ range over?
leigh ramona said:
Symmetric is x R y = y R x
This sentence is also problematic. For each $x$ and $y$, $xRy$ is either true or false. What do you mean by $xRx=yRx$? For which $x$ and $y$?
leigh ramona said:
Transitive is if x R y and y R z, then x R z.
This would be correct if you added "for all $x$, $y$ and $z$".
leigh ramona said:
The relation is symmetric because if A \cap C = B \cap C, then C \cap A = C \cap B. Is this correct?
What you wrote is true, but what does this have to do with $R$? Please enclose formulas in dollar signs: \$A\cap C\$.
leigh ramona said:
The relation is also transitive, because if A \cap C and B \cap C, then A \cap B.
This does not makes sense because $A\cap C$ cannot be true or false: it's a set. Therefore, you can't write "If $A\cap C$...".
If you increase the level of your precision, it will help you not only to communicate more clearly, but to understand the problem and definitions better as well.