Proving sin^0 (x): Is it 0, x, or Something Else?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysForumID
  • Start date Start date
PhysForumID
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
What would sin^0 (x) mean? sin^n (x) means using the sine function 'n' times on x, so what does it mean to use it zero times? does sin^0 (x) then equal 'x' or '0' or... ?

The context of this question is that I have to prove that:
I_n = integral from zero to pi/2 of sin^n (x) with respect to 'x'

I am proving this by induction starting with n=0, assuming true for n=n and showing it is true for n=n+1
 
on Phys.org
[tex]sin^{0}(x) = (sin0)^{0} = 1[/tex]
Is n a natural number? Then start with n = 1.
 
sorry maybe I've got more than that confused in my head... I always understand sinn (x) to mean you use the function 'sine' 'n' times on x, rather than take sin(x) and multiply it by 'n'... am I wrong there? Surely not because sin(sin(pi/2)) >< {sin(pi/2)}^2

and yes n is a natural number but starting from 0
 
PhysForumID said:
sorry maybe I've got more than that confused in my head... I always understand sinn (x) to mean you use the function 'sine' 'n' times on x, rather than take sin(x) and multiply it by 'n'... am I wrong there? Surely not because sin(sin(pi/2)) >< {sin(pi/2)}^2

[itex]sin^{2}(x)[/itex] is shorthand for [itex]sin(x)sin(x)[/itex], and so on for arbitrary n. A value raised to the power of 0 equals 1 due to the fact that [itex]x^{n} = x*x^{n-1}[/itex], so...
[tex]x^{0} = x*x^{-1} = x*\frac{1}{x} = 1[/tex]

and yes n is a natural number but starting from 0

Zero isn't a natural number. This is me being pedantic, of course, and you can still begin with n=0 if you like. Can you elaborate on what you're trying to prove? What in the integral supposed to equal?
 
Last edited:
wow I have no idea how I got this far in uni making that mistake about what sin^2(x) was... thanks number nine :)

and sorry, that was my mistake for saying it was a natural number. n = {0,1,2...}

the integral is given and we have to show that I_0 > I_1 > I_2 > ... etc
 
Can you show that [itex]\sin^{n}(x) > \sin^{n+1}(x)[/itex] for all n? Once you do, can you see how to use this to solve the problem?

Also, I'd like to say that I think the notation [itex]\sin^2(x)[/itex] to mean [itex](\sin(x))^2[/itex] is very unfortunate. It is often the case that [itex]f^2(x)[/itex] is taken to mean [itex]f(f(x))[/itex] as you had thought, PhysForumID. This is almost always the case with the exponent -1, since [itex]f^{-1}[/itex] usually denotes the inverse of f with respect to functional composition, not multiplication. One great confusion people often have while learning trigonometry is that [itex]\sin^2(x) = (\sin(x))^2[/itex], but [itex]\sin^{-1}(x) \neq (\sin(x))^{-1}[/itex]. Rather [itex]\sin(\sin^{-1}(x))=x[/itex], since here the exponent refers to functional composition and not multiplication.

Zero isn't a natural number. This is me being pedantic, of course, and you can still begin with n=0 if you like.

There is no consensus on whether or not 0 is a natural number. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_number" :
Including 0 is now the common convention among set theorists, logicians, and computer scientists. Many other mathematicians also include 0, although some have kept the older tradition and take 1 to be the first natural number.

You can use either convention as long as you're consistent. If you really want to be unambiguous, you can say "non-negative integers" and "positive integers."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Moderator's note: thread moved from "General Math" to "Homework & Coursework Questions". Rules for homework help are in effect.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K