Proving that a fifth-degree polynomial has a root using just the IVT

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eclair_de_XII
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial Root
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that a fifth-degree polynomial has a root using the Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT). Three cases are considered based on the sign of the constant term, a_0. For a_0 equal to zero, the polynomial evaluates to zero at x=0. When a_0 is negative, a maximum value M is defined to show that f(x) is positive for sufficiently large x, while for negative x, the polynomial remains negative, leading to the conclusion that there exists an x in the interval where f(x) equals zero. The approach is critiqued for unnecessarily dividing the proof into cases, suggesting a more straightforward method using limits and the IVT to demonstrate the existence of roots.
Eclair_de_XII
Messages
1,082
Reaction score
91
Homework Statement
Let ##f(x)=a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2+a_3x^3+a_4x^4+x^5##, where ##a_i\in \mathbb{R}##. Show that there is an ##x\in \mathbb{R}## such that ##f(x)=0##, without citing the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra.
Relevant Equations
Intermediate Value Theorem: Let ##g## be a real-valued function whose domain is contained in the field of real numbers. Suppose that for some ##a,b##, ##a<b##, in the domain, ##g(a)<0## and ##g(b)>0##. Then there is a ##c\in (a,b)## such that ##g(c)=0##.
I consider three cases, based on the sign of ##a_0##.

if ##a_0 == 0##:

Set ##x=0##.

\begin{align*}
f(0)&=&a_0+a_1\cdot 0+a_2\cdot 0^2+a_3\cdot0^3+a_4\cdot0^4+0^5\\
&=&a_0+0\\
&=&0+0\\
&=&0
\end{align*}

elif ##a_0<0##:

Define ##M=\max\{|a_i|:1\leq a_i\leq 5\}## and set ##x=5(M+1)\neq 0##.

Note: ##M+1>1##, so ##\frac{1}{M+1}<1##.

So for any summand in the bottom-most equation, the following must hold:

\begin{align*}

\frac{a_k}{(5(M+1))^k}&\leq&\frac{|a_k|}{5(M+1)}\cdot\frac{1}{(5(M+1))^{k-1}}\\

&\leq&\frac{1}{5}\cdot\frac{1}{(5(M+1))^{k-1})}\\

&<&\frac{1}{(5(M+1))^{k-1}}\\

&\leq&1

\end{align*}

Therefore, ##f(x)>0## for this choice of ##x##.

\begin{align*}

f(x)&=&x^{5}\left(\frac{a_0}{x^5}+\frac{a_1}{x^4}+\frac{a_2}{x^3}+\frac{a_3}{x^2}+\frac{a_4}{x}+1\right)\\

%

&=&5^5(M+1)^5 \left(1-\sum_{i=0}^4 \frac{|a_i|}{(5(M+1))^{5-i})}\right)\\

%

&\geq&5^5(M+1)^5 \left(1-\sum_{i=0}^4 \frac{1}{(5)^{5-i}}\right)\\

%

&>&5^5(M+1)^5 \left(1-\sum_{i=0}^4 \frac{1}{5}\right)\\

%

&=&5^5(M+1)^5 \left(1-5\cdot\frac{1}{5}\right)\\

%

&=&5^5(M+1)^5 \left(1-1\right)\\

%

&=&0

\end{align*}

I want someone to double-check my work before I post my solution for the case where ##a_0>0##.

But I feel like I could just take define some function ##h(x)=-f(x)## and the result would follow.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No need for proof by cases. It is enough to show that f(x) \to \infty as x \to \infty and f(x) \to -\infty as x \to -\infty.

From that you can deduce the existence of R_1 \in \mathbb{R} and R_2 \in \mathbb{R} such that R_1 &lt; R_2 and f(R_1) &lt; 0 &lt; f(R_2).
 
  • Like
Likes archaic, Delta2, FactChecker and 1 other person
Your proof has taken a wrong turn by dividing it into cases depending on ##a_0##. Other than that, I can see that your proof so far can not be correct since your definition of M only depends on the coefficients between 1 and 5. There may not be any coefficients like that, so M would not be defined. Try M = max({1,|##a_i##|, i=0,4}). Then if x>5*M, what can you say about f(x)? What about if x < -5*M?
 
FactChecker said:
There may not be any coefficients like that

Oh. I had meant to put ##1\leq i\leq 4##, not ##1\leq a_i\leq 5##. In any case, I can see that the inequality immediately after that fails if all ##a_i=0##. Anyway:

FactChecker said:
Try ##M = \max({1,|a_i|, i=0,4})##. Then if x>5*M, what can you say about f(x)? What about if x < -5*M?

if ##x >5M##:

##x>5|a_i|## or alternatively, ##\frac{1}{5}>\frac{|a_i|}{x}## for all ##i##
##x>1## and ##\frac{1}{x}<1##

\begin{align}

f\left(x\right)&=&x^5\left(1+\sum_{k=0}^4 \frac{a_k}{x^{5-k}}\right)\\

&\geq&x^5\left(1-\sum_{k=0}^4 \frac{|a_k|}{x^{5-k}}\right)\\

&=&x^5\left(1-\sum_{k=0}^4 \frac{|a_k|}{x}\cdot\frac{1}{x^{5-k-1}}\right)\\

&>&x^5\left(1-\frac{1}{5}\sum_{k=0}^4 \frac{1}{x^{5-k-1}}\right)\\

&>&x^5\left(1-\frac{1}{5}\sum_{k=0}^4 1\right)\\

&=&x^5\left(1-\frac{1}{5}\cdot5\right)\\

&=&x^5\left(1-1\right)\\

&=&0
\end{align}

elif ##x<-5M##:

##x<0## since ##x<-5M## and ##-5M < 0##

\begin{align}
f\left(x\right)&=&x^5\left(1+\sum_{k=0}^4 \frac{a_k}{x^{5-k}}\right)\\
&=&x^5\left(1-\frac{a_3}{x^2}-\frac{a_1}{x^4}+\sum_{k=0}^2 \frac{a_{2k}}{x^{2k}}\right)\\
&\leq&x^5\left(1-\frac{2}{5}+\sum_{k=0}^2 \frac{a_{2k}}{|x^{2k}|}\right)\\
&\leq&x^5\left(1-\frac{2}{5}-\sum_{k=0}^2 \frac{|a_{2k}|}{|x^{2k}|}\right)\\
&\leq&x^5\left(1-\frac{2}{5}-\frac{1}{5}\sum_{k=0}^2 1\right)\\
&=&x^5\left(1-\frac{2}{5}-\frac{3}{5}\right)\\
&=&0
\end{align}

And so there is an ##x## in ##[-5M,5M]## such that ##f(x)=0##, by the intermediate value theorem.
 
Last edited:
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top