Verify this result when ## n=10 ##

  • Thread starter Math100
  • Start date
In summary: I see. And the results when ## n=10 ## match each other in the equation. It's ## 130+130+130+130=4+16+100+400=520... 520=520 ##.Yes, it seems to be correct. So the proof is verified for ##n=10##. In summary, the equation ## \sum_{d\mid n}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{n}{d})=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{n}{d}) ## has been proven using the Möbius function and verified for the specific case of ##
  • #1
Math100
779
220
Homework Statement
Prove that ## \sum_{d\mid n}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{n}{d})=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{n}{d}) ##, and verify this result when ## n=10 ##.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof:

Observe that
\begin{align*}
\sum_{d\mid n}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{n}{d})&=(N^{2}\ast u)\ast (N^{2}\ast u) \text{ since } \sigma_{2}(n)=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\cdot 1=N^{2}\ast u)\\
&=(u\ast N^{2})\ast (N^{2}\ast u)\\
&=u\ast (N^{2}\ast N^{2})\ast u\\
&=u\ast (N^{2}\sigma_{0})\ast u \text{ since } N^{2}\ast N^{2}=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}(\frac{n^{2}}{d^{2}})=n^{2}\sum_{d\mid n}1=N^{2}\sigma_{0} \\
&=N^{2}\sigma_{0}\ast (u\ast u) \text{ since } u\ast u=\sigma_{0} \\
&=N^{2}\sigma_{0}\ast \sigma_{0}\\
&=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{n}{d}).\\
\end{align*}
Therefore, ## \sum_{d\mid n}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{n}{d})=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{n}{d}) ##.
Now we will verify this result when ## n=10 ##.
Consider the divisors ## d\in\left \{ 1, 2, 5, 10 \right \} ##.
Observe that
\begin{align*}
\sum_{d\mid 10}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{d})&\stackrel{?}{=}\sum_{d\mid 10}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{d})
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
&\sigma_{2}(1)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{1})+\sigma_{2}(2)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{2})+\sigma_{2}(5)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{5})+\sigma_{2}(10)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{10})\\
&\stackrel{?}{=}1^{2}\sigma_{0}(1)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{1})+2^{2}\sigma_{0}(2)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{2})+5^{2}\sigma_{0}(5)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{5})+10^{2}\sigma_{0}(10)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{10}).
\end{align*}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I was thinking ## \sigma_{0}(1)=1, \sigma_{0}(2)=2, \sigma_{0}(5)=2, \sigma_{0}(10)=4 ##. But what should ## \sigma_{2}(1), \sigma_{2}(2), \sigma_{2}(5), \sigma_{2}(10) ## be?
 
  • #3
Math100 said:
Homework Statement:: Prove that ## \sum_{d\mid n}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{n}{d})=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{n}{d}) ##, and verify this result when ## n=10 ##.
Relevant Equations:: None.

Proof:

Observe that
\begin{align*}
\sum_{d\mid n}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{n}{d})&=(N^{2}\ast u)\ast (N^{2}\ast u) \text{ since } \sigma_{2}(n)=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\cdot 1=N^{2}\ast u)\\
&=(u\ast N^{2})\ast (N^{2}\ast u)\\
&=u\ast (N^{2}\ast N^{2})\ast u\\
&=u\ast (N^{2}\sigma_{0})\ast u \text{ since } N^{2}\ast N^{2}=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}(\frac{n^{2}}{d^{2}})=n^{2}\sum_{d\mid n}1=N^{2}\sigma_{0} \\
&=N^{2}\sigma_{0}\ast (u\ast u) \text{ since } u\ast u=\sigma_{0} \\
&=N^{2}\sigma_{0}\ast \sigma_{0}\\
&=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{n}{d}).\\
\end{align*}
Therefore, ## \sum_{d\mid n}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{n}{d})=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{n}{d}) ##.
Now we will verify this result when ## n=10 ##.
Consider the divisors ## d\in\left \{ 1, 2, 5, 10 \right \} ##.
Observe that
\begin{align*}
\sum_{d\mid 10}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{d})&\stackrel{?}{=}\sum_{d\mid 10}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{d})
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
&\sigma_{2}(1)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{1})+\sigma_{2}(2)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{2})+\sigma_{2}(5)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{5})+\sigma_{2}(10)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{10})\\
&\stackrel{?}{=}1^{2}\sigma_{0}(1)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{1})+2^{2}\sigma_{0}(2)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{2})+5^{2}\sigma_{0}(5)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{5})+10^{2}\sigma_{0}(10)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{10}).
\end{align*}
I corrected the LaTeX. I cannot check the proof since I still don't know what ##N## and ##u## are.

The equation where I added a question mark needs to be checked, i.e. you have to calculate the sigma function values and add them. We have
$$
\sigma_k(n) =\sum_{d|n}d^k
$$
This means that ##\sigma_0## is the number of divisors, e.g. ##\sigma_0(10)= |\{1,2,5,10\}|=4.## For ##\sigma_2## we have to calculate e.g.
$$
\sigma_2(10) =\sum_{d|10}d^2=\sum_{d\in \{1,2,5,10\}} d^2 =1^2+2^2+5^2+10^2=130
$$

Or you look up the values in the table here:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teilerfunktion
 
  • Like
Likes Math100
  • #4
fresh_42 said:
I corrected the LaTeX. I cannot check the proof since I still don't know what ##N## and ##u## are.

The equation where I added a question mark needs to be checked, i.e. you have to calculate the sigma function values and add them. We have
$$
\sigma_k(n) =\sum_{d|n}d^k
$$
This means that ##\sigma_0## is the number of divisors, e.g. ##\sigma_0(10)= |\{1,2,5,10\}|=4.## For ##\sigma_2## we have to calculate e.g.
$$
\sigma_2(10) =\sum_{d|10}d^2=\sum_{d\in \{1,2,5,10\}} d^2 =1^2+2^2+5^2+10^2=130
$$

Or you look up the values in the table here:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teilerfunktion
It's okay, you don't necessarily need to check the proof. I just wanted to know how to compute those values at the end, the verification part.
 
  • #5
Math100 said:
It's okay, you don't necessarily need to check the proof. I just wanted to know how to compute those values at the end, the verification part.
The formula looks like a convolution, a variation of
$$
(f\ast g)(n)=\sum_{k\in D} f(k) g(n/k).
$$
Would be nice to understand the details, i.e. to see the proof why the divisor formulas can be written that way.
 
  • Like
Likes Math100
  • #6
I think I have found it in a book. Möbius function seems to be the key word.
 
  • Informative
Likes Math100
  • #7
fresh_42 said:
I think I have found it in a book. Möbius function seems to be the key word.
What book?
 
  • #8
Math100 said:
What book?
A book on number theory. It's been a long time since I last time had a look.
 
  • #9
fresh_42 said:
A book on number theory. It's been a long time since I last time had a look.
I see. And the results when ## n=10 ## match each other in the equation. It's ## 130+130+130+130=4+16+100+400=520 ##.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42

FAQ: Verify this result when ## n=10 ##

1. What does "Verify this result when n=10" mean?

When a result is asked to be verified when n=10, it means that the given equation or hypothesis should be tested and proven true or false when the value of n (or the sample size) is equal to 10.

2. How do I verify a result when n=10?

To verify a result when n=10, you will need to plug in the value of n=10 into the given equation or hypothesis and solve for the result. You can also use statistical analysis or experiments to verify the result.

3. Why is it important to verify a result when n=10?

Verifying a result when n=10 is important because it allows for a better understanding and confirmation of the validity of the equation or hypothesis. It also helps to ensure that the results are not due to chance or coincidence.

4. Can I use a different value for n when verifying a result?

Yes, you can use a different value for n when verifying a result. However, using the specified value of n=10 allows for consistency and comparability with other studies or experiments.

5. What if the result is not verified when n=10?

If the result is not verified when n=10, it could mean that the equation or hypothesis is not accurate or that there are other factors influencing the result. It may be necessary to further analyze or adjust the equation or hypothesis to obtain a verified result.

Back
Top