(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); I applied some mathematical view to the daily language while studying demonstration.

Proving that nothing does not exist

Consider the following hypothesis by definition:

1. (There's nothing) -> (There's the absence of everything)

2. (There's nothing) -> (There's the absence of everything) -> (There's the absence of the absence of everything)¹ -> (There's everything) -> ~(There's the absence of everything)

And consider the following hypothesis by logic:

3. (There's nothing) v ~(There's nothing)²

4. ~[(There's the absence of everything) ^ ~(There's the absence of everything)]³

By 1 and 2, we have:

5. (There's nothing) -> (There's the absence of everything) ^ ~(There's the absence of everything)

By 5 and 3, we have:

6. [(There's the absence of everything) ^ ~(There's the absence of everything)] v ~(There's nothing)

By 6 and 4, we have:

7. ~(There's nothing)

Q.E.D.

¹ - Cause "everything" includes the "absence of everything", since "absence of everything" is something.

² - Law of excluded middle

³ - Law of non-contradiction

As a result, the space is not full of nothing. Cause nothing does not exist.

Is the demonstration right?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Proving that nothing does not exist

Loading...

Similar Threads - Proving nothing does | Date |
---|---|

B How to "prove" something in math? | Thursday at 3:14 PM |

How to prove vector identities WITHOUT using levi civita ? | Nov 27, 2017 |

B Prove that tangents to the focal cord of parabola... | Nov 16, 2017 |

I Prove that only one straight line passes through two point | Sep 19, 2017 |

Is all Math nothing more than addition? | Mar 25, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**