Proving the conservation of momentum when two masses are not equal

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the conservation of momentum in elastic collisions involving two different masses, specifically a glass marble and a steel marble. The original poster is tasked with deriving a specific formula related to the momentum of the glass marble when it collides with the steel marble, particularly when the glass marble is initially at rest.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between momentum and velocity in the context of different masses. The original poster attempts to derive the formula using conservation principles but struggles with the lack of variables provided. Others suggest that the ratio of the masses plays a critical role in understanding the momentum transfer during the collision.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the formula and its derivation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between mass and velocity, but there is no consensus on a definitive method to derive the formula as requested by the original poster.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves measuring velocities through displacement over time, which complicates the derivation of the formula. There is an acknowledgment of the challenge posed by the teacher's request for a mathematical proof without explicit variables provided.

Stan2309
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In this exercise we used steel and glass balls to calculate and prove the conservation of momentum in elastic collisions. I had to prove how momentum is conserved through displacements vectors and right triangles. All that stuff is easy and I got it. The last question is where I am stuck. The question states: When the mass of the 2marbles (glass and steel) are not the same, and they collide (the glass marble was initially at rest), why do you need to use the formula Pglass = (mglass/msteel) x Vglass (in the brackets the mass of the glass marble is divided by the mass of the steel marble, but we are not given any variables and are just required to prove or derive this formula)?

Homework Equations


I attempted to derive this formula through P total initial= P total final and the conservation of kinetic energy. 1/2m1v1i^2(squared) + 1/2m2v2i^2 = 1/2m1v1f^2 + 1/2m2v2f^2


The Attempt at a Solution


when i expand the formulas and substitute them into each other, I just end up with the equations for 1D elastic collisions v1f=(m1-m2/m1+m2)v1i and respectively v2f=(2m1/m1+m2)v1i
I spent the whole night going through all 3 of my physics textbooks and many websites online but couldn't find the way to prove or derive that formula. My teacher said it was a hard question but I never thought it would be this difficult. Oh by the way this is Gr.12 Academic physics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stan2309 said:

Homework Statement



In this exercise we used steel and glass balls to calculate and prove the conservation of momentum in elastic collisions. I had to prove how momentum is conserved through displacements vectors and right triangles. All that stuff is easy and I got it. The last question is where I am stuck. The question states: When the mass of the 2marbles (glass and steel) are not the same, and they collide (the glass marble was initially at rest), why do you need to use the formula Pglass = (mglass/msteel) x Vglass (in the brackets the mass of the glass marble is divided by the mass of the steel marble, but we are not given any variables and are just required to prove or derive this formula)?

Homework Equations


I attempted to derive this formula through P total initial= P total final and the conservation of kinetic energy. 1/2m1v1i^2(squared) + 1/2m2v2i^2 = 1/2m1v1f^2 + 1/2m2v2f^2


The Attempt at a Solution


when i expand the formulas and substitute them into each other, I just end up with the equations for 1D elastic collisions v1f=(m1-m2/m1+m2)v1i and respectively v2f=(2m1/m1+m2)v1i
I spent the whole night going through all 3 of my physics textbooks and many websites online but couldn't find the way to prove or derive that formula. My teacher said it was a hard question but I never thought it would be this difficult. Oh by the way this is Gr.12 Academic physics.


In this experiment you are measuring velocities [by referring to displacement in a fixed time]

You are then trying to show conservation of momentum.

The only measure you have is velocity, but momentum is the product of mass and velocity.

When you do the experiment with two equal steel balls, the mass of a steel ball is effectively just a scaling factor for the velocity - so you can do a diagram of velocity vectors - in arbitrary units - to show momentum is conserved.

When you use balls of different masses [steel and glass], to merely use the velocity of each ball is not suitable.
Since velocity is measured in arbitrary units - displacement / some time (perhaps the time taken to fall a set distance) - and mass is effectively a "scaling factor", we have to match those scaling factors. By using Mglass/ Msteel that is achieved.
or example; if the glass ball is 1/3rd the mass of the steel ball, it will be traveling 3-times a s fast for an equivalent momentum value.

Hope that all makes sense.

Peter
 
yeah i get what we're doing and all, but my teacher want me to derive this formula. I'm suspecting it has something to do with the glass/steel ratio and the displacement vectors. Need mathematical proof D:
 
Stan2309 said:
yeah i get what we're doing and all, but my teacher want me to derive this formula. I'm suspecting it has something to do with the glass/steel ratio and the displacement vectors. Need mathematical proof D:

You will never be able to prove it!

The formula you wrote was:

Pglass = (mglass/msteel) x Vglass

LHS has units of momentum; because it is momentum.

RHS has units of velocity; because the mass units cancel out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K