Elastic collision between two balls with different masses

  • Thread starter kshitij
  • Start date
  • #1
218
27
Homework Statement:
A ball of mass m1 is moving with velocity 3v. It collides head on elastically with a stationary ball of mass m2 . The velocity of both the balls become v after collision. Then the value of the ratio m2/m1 is
Relevant Equations:
Conservation of momentum, Conservation of energy
Since in an elastic collision, both momentum and energy is conserved,
P(initial)=P(final)
m1(3v)=m1v+m2v
m2/m1=2
Which was the given answer but if we use conservation of energy,
K.E(initial)=K.E(final)
1/2*m1*(3v)^2=1/2*m2*v^2+1/2*m1*v^2
m2/m1=8
Why do we get two different answers and why doesn't conservation of energy gives us the right answer here?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
18,135
9,821
Homework Statement:: A ball of mass m1 is moving with velocity 3v. It collides head on elastically with a stationary ball of mass m2 . The velocity of both the balls become v after collision. Then the value of the ratio m2/m1 is
Relevant Equations:: Conservation of momentum, Conservation of energy

Since in an elastic collision, both momentum and energy is conserved,
P(initial)=P(final)
m1(3v)=m1v+m2v
m2/m1=2
Which was the given answer but if we use conservation of energy,
K.E(initial)=K.E(final)
1/2*m1*(3v)^2=1/2*m2*v^2+1/2*m1*v^2
m2/m1=8
Why do we get two different answers and why doesn't conservation of energy gives us the right answer here?
Why do you think energy is conserved in this collision?
 
  • #3
218
27
Why do you think energy is conserved in this collision?
A perfectly elastic collision is defined as one in which there is no loss in kinetic energy in the collision. That's what I've been taught.
 
  • #4
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
18,135
9,821
A perfectly elastic collision is defined as one in which there is no loss in kinetic energy in the collision. That's what I've been taught.
Why do you think this is a perfectly elastic collision?
 
  • #5
218
27
Why do you think this is a perfectly elastic collision?
The question states that they collide elastically but if you're saying that they didn't include the word perfectly then I understand.
 
  • #6
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
18,135
9,821
The question states that they collide elastically but if you're saying that they didn't include the word perfectly then I understand.
Sorry, I missed that. The question is wrong.

Another way to describe an elastic collision is that the "separation speed" is conserved. I.e. the speed at which the objects are moving apart after the collision is the same as the speed at which they are moving together before the collision. With a bit of algebra you can show that is the same as conservation of kinetic energy.

In this case, as the balls stick together after the collision, it cannot be elastic. In fact, when they stick together is is called a totally inelastic collision. And, again with a bit of algebra, you can show that this represents the maximum possible energy loss.

In short, you cannot have conservation of energy in this scenario.

You always have conservation of momentum. So, in this case the solution is simply to use that.
 
  • #7
218
27
Sorry, I missed that. The question is wrong.

Another way to describe an elastic collision is that the "separation speed" is conserved. I.e. the speed at which the objects are moving apart after the collision is the same as the speed at which they are moving together before the collision. With a bit of algebra you can show that is the same as conservation of kinetic energy.

In this case, as the balls stick together after the collision, it cannot be elastic. In fact, when they stick together is is called a totally inelastic collision. And, again with a bit of algebra, you can show that this represents the maximum possible energy loss.

In short, you cannot have conservation of energy in this scenario.

You always have conservation of momentum. So, in this case the solution is simply to use that.
I thought the catch was that every collision is elastic but only in perfectly elastic collisions coefficient of restitution(e) is exactly equal to 1 and in perfectly inelastic collision, e=0.

But as you said that they move together with the same velocity after collision so here e=0 so they should write perfectly inelastic instead of elastic in the question but anyway thanks for helping me.
 
  • #8
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
18,135
9,821
I thought the catch was that every collision is elastic but only in perfectly elastic collisions coefficient of restitution(e) is exactly equal to 1 and in perfectly inelastic collision, e=0.

But as you said that they move together with the same velocity after collision so here e=0 so they should write perfectly inelastic instead of elastic in the question but anyway thanks for helping me.
Elastic is unambigously the same as perfectly elastic: no loss of KE.

Inelastic has more variety, in that there is a range of KE than may be lost, up to the maximum amount where the objects stick together, which is called perfectly inelastic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inelastic_collision
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes SilverSoldier and kshitij
  • #9
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
36,738
7,083
"The velocity of both the balls become v after collision"
It occurred to me that they might mean (or perhaps even wrote) speed rather than velocity. But it doesn't help, merely creating the extra possible solution to the momentum equation m2 =4m1.
 

Related Threads on Elastic collision between two balls with different masses

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
25K
Replies
7
Views
22K
Top