Proving the Recursion Formula for $(x_n)$ Using Strong Induction

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KOO
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the recursion formula for the sequence $(x_n)$ defined by $x_1 = 3$, $x_2 = 7$, and $x_{n+1} = 5x_n - 6x_{n-1}$. The closed form for this sequence is established as $x_n = 2^n + 3^{n-1}$ for all natural numbers $n$. The proof utilizes strong induction, confirming the base cases for $n=1$ and $n=2$, and proceeds to assume the formula holds for $k$ to prove it for $k+1$. The discussion also highlights the potential for alternative methods to derive the closed form.

PREREQUISITES
  • Strong induction principles
  • Understanding of recursive sequences
  • Basic algebraic manipulation
  • Familiarity with exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of strong induction in depth
  • Explore alternative methods for solving recursive sequences
  • Learn about generating functions for sequences
  • Investigate the characteristics of linear homogeneous recurrence relations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, computer scientists, and students studying discrete mathematics or recursion, particularly those interested in proof techniques and sequence analysis.

KOO
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Let $(x_n)$ be a sequence given by the following recursion formula:

$$x_1 = 3, x_2 = 7,\text{ and }x_{n+1} = 5x_n - 6x_{n-1}$$

Prove that for all $n\in\Bbb N$, $x_n = 2^n + 3^{n-1}$.

Attempt:

For $n = 1$, we have $2^1 + 3^0 = 3 = x_1$ TRUE
For $n = 2$, we have $2^2 + 3^1 = 7 = x_2$ TRUE

Assume $x_k = 2^k + 3^{k-1}$ for some $k\in\Bbb N$.

Now, for $n = k+1$:

$$\begin{align*}
x_{k+1} &= 5x_k - 6x_{k-1}\\
&= 5\left(2^k + 3^{k-1}\right) - 6\left(2^{k-1} + 3^{k-2}\right)
\end{align*}$$

What Next?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you required to use induction, or did you choose to do so, because there is a much simpler way to derive the closed form for the recursion.
 
MarkFL said:
Are you required to use induction, or did you choose to do so, because there is a much simpler way to derive the closed form for the recursion.

We are required to use induction.
 
Okay as your next step, I would distribute on the right side, keeping in mind that $6=2\cdot3$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K