Proving the Wedge Product of 2 One-Forms is a 2-Form

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The wedge product of two one-forms, represented as ##(A \wedge B)_{\mu \nu} = A_\mu B_\nu - A_\nu B_\mu##, is confirmed to be a 2-form, or (0,2) tensor. To demonstrate this, the transformation law ##(A \wedge B)_{\mu' \nu'} = \Lambda_{\mu'}^\mu \Lambda_{\nu'}^\nu (A \wedge B)_{\mu \nu}## must hold. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper index notation and placement, as well as the commutative nature of tensor components, which are treated as real numbers. The transformation law for a second-rank tensor is correctly stated as ##T_{\mu \nu}'={\Lambda^{\rho}}_{\mu} {\Lambda^{\sigma}}_{\nu} T^{\rho \sigma}##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wedge products in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with one-forms and tensor notation
  • Knowledge of transformation laws for tensors
  • Basic linear algebra concepts, particularly matrix operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of wedge products in differential geometry
  • Learn about the transformation laws for higher-rank tensors
  • Explore the implications of index notation in tensor calculus
  • Investigate the role of commutativity in tensor products
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of differential geometry or tensor analysis seeking to deepen their understanding of tensor products and transformations.

Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I was trying to show that the wedge product of 2 one-forms is a 2-form. So we have ## (A \wedge B)_{\mu \nu} = A_\mu B_\nu - A_\nu B_\mu ##. So to show that this is a (0,2) tensor, we need to show that ##(A \wedge B)_{\mu' \nu'} = \Lambda_{\mu'}^\mu \Lambda_{\nu'}^\nu (A \wedge B)_{\mu \nu}##. But ##A_{\mu'} B_{\nu'} - A_{\nu'} B_{\mu'} = \Lambda_{\mu'}^\mu A_\mu \Lambda_{\nu'}^\nu B_\nu - \Lambda_{\nu'}^\nu A_\nu \Lambda_{\mu'}^\mu B_\mu ##. I am not sure how to proceed from here, as the matrices don't commute, so I can't bring the ##\Lambda## in the front. What should I do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What matrices? Those are just numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Also again, be warned about this sloppy notation of indizes. You should put the prime on the symbol (or in addition to the symbol). Otherwise the equations don't make sense strictly speaking (I know that some unfortunate textbooks use this very dangerous notation). Also make sure that both the "vertical and horizontal" placement of the indices is accurate. For a 2nd-rank tensor the transformation law should be written as
$$T_{\mu \nu}'={\Lambda^{\rho}}_{\mu} {\Lambda^{\sigma}}_{\nu} T^{\rho \sigma}.$$
Concerning your question, Orodruin has given you the right hint. The tensor components are all numbers, and thus the product is the usual commutative product of real numbers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
956
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
710
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K