MHB Are These Sets Vector Subspaces of R^3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspaces Vector
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on determining whether two sets, V and W, are vector subspaces of R^3. It is established that both sets contain the zero vector, which is a necessary condition for being a subspace. Set W is confirmed as a subspace after proving that x must equal zero. For set V, the conclusion is reached that both x-y=0 and z=0 must hold, indicating it is also a subspace. Ultimately, both sets V and W qualify as vector subspaces of R^3.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I am trying to find if these two sets are vector subspaces of R^3.

\[V=\left \{ (x,y,z)\in R^{3}|(x-y)^{2}+z^{2}=0 \right \}\]

\[W=\left \{ (x,y,z)\in R^{3}|(x+1)^{2}=x^{2}+1 \right \}\]

In both cases the zero vector is in the set, therefore I just need to prove closure to addition and to scalar multiplication. Can you kindly assist ?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Yankel,

Your analysis is off to a good start when you noted that $0 = (0,0,0)$ is a member of both sets. It is helpful to look at the equations to see if we can infer from them any information about these subspaces of $\mathbb{R}^{3}.$ In the case of $W$, for example, try filling in the details of the argument that allows us to conclude $x=0.$ From there it may be easier to establish/refute the remaining subspace properties we must check. Feel free to ask any follow up questions.
 
Thank you. I have managed to prove W is a subspace using your tip that x=0 (got it why it is). I can't prove the other set. Can't bring the condition to a simpler form.
 
Nicely done. Yes, $W$ is a linear subspace of $\mathbb{R}^{3}.$ To analyze $V$, note that each of the terms (thinking of $(x-y)$ as one term) is squared and that the sum of these two squared terms is zero. Can you conclude anything from thinking along these lines?
 
Oh...silly me. x-y = 0 and z=0.

So V is also a subspace, has to be then.
 
For W, the equation that must be satisfied does not involve y or z. $(x+ 1)^2= x^2+ 2x+ 1= x^2+ 1$ so 2x= 0 and x= 0. The problem is to show that the subset or $R^3$, \{(0, y, z)\}$, with y and z any real numbers, is a subspace.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K